Osolea You're right, but miscarriage is very common and affects so many people, which is why I'm so surprised that there is no aftercare or support.
You only realise how common certain things are when they happen close to home, but it being common doesn't mean it deserves more support IMO.
Of course the medical care should be of a good standard, as it should be for anyone who needs the services of a hospital, but I thought the OP was focussing on the after care once someone has left the hospital, not the way they are treated when they're still in it.
I think you have to make the distinction between medical care and after care and support. It may seem short sighted to not invest in services for every set of parents that has miscarried, but thankfully not every family is traumatised long term by miscarriage, and not every couple has a lack of family and friends, or a lack of ability to find services that could help them. So as with most things public sector, it comes down to money, it has to be weighed up - the benefits and savings versus the costs.
I'd love to see people who suffered miscarriage get all the support they need for free, but I say the same for people who have suffered other bereavements, who are traumatised after long illnesses or abuse, or who have any personal circumstances that could lead to depression really.
Where cost makes no difference, as detailed in some of the experiences here where it's just a case of hospital staff being more sensitive and professional, then of course people should receive the treatment and support they need.