Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Or is the vicar? Noisy DCs in church

861 replies

drspouse · 14/02/2016 13:32

Background so as not to drip feed, bear with me as this is horrendously long: we go to a fairly naice church in a large historic building, locally there is a sought after church secondary school but none of the church primary schools are over subscribed. We've been going to this church for 12 years and we have two DC, aged 4 and 1. The 4yo is being investigated for mild SN and has always, always been very "lively". DC2 is walking.

The church knows us. Current vicar has been there about as long as our DC1 and baptised both of them. Church has a side chapel which is open to the rest of the pews where there are baby/toddler toys, a mat to play on. One other family (who are new to the country and have a 10 month old) use this baby play area every week.

The 4yo goes to Sunday School in term time, one of us goes with him, as we take it in turns and it doesn't last the whole service, both of us get some time during the service actually in the church. He's just starting to be able to stay in for 10 minutes on his own. DC2 is still lively and, yes, noisy in the side chapel. The other regular family's baby isn't walking yet. When smaller, both he and our DC2 could be quietened by feeding or carrying around.

Because of the pressure for secondary admission, most of the families that come have primary aged children. I can think of a couple of other families who are regulars with young DCs e.g. one Sunday School teacher has an 18 month old but I think she is restrained sat with them on non-Sunday School weeks not in the side chapel.

Today was the first weekend of half term, no Sunday school, there were 2 other children at church apart from our "baby chapel" group, maybe 6 and 8, who were using a construction toy in the side chapel for part of the time. Our DC1 was running around, fairly quietly, but was also throwing a small, soft, non-dangerous teddy up and down and catching it or running to get it. Frankly the only way to stop this would have been to physically restrain DC1 leading to shouting, screaming and kicking. This could be seen from the main church. DC2 was very excited by this and was squeaking, and also as a new walker fell over 2 or 3 times and cried, and was cuddled, and then was quiet.

Half way through someone came in and said "did we know the other room was open, we could go there if we wished". We declined and said no, we wouldn't, because where would be the point in being at church if we were not in the church? we might as well stay home. This is the first time in four years anyone has said anything, and I was massively surprised. It's definitely not the first time we were noisy!

The vicar stopped me on the way out and repeated that something had to be done, that it was distracting, people had complained, and that it was "exciting the other children" (the ones quietly using a construction toy? or the 10 month old who was quiet?) I said that the answer was not for us to go out because there was no point in us going to church if we couldn't be IN church. He repeated that "something must be done".

How does your church run this? Can you give us any ideas for suggestions? We want to bring this up and make some constructive suggestions (though frankly if the church can't put up with noise, it can't put up with children, and it will be left with definitely nobody under 5 and probably nobody under 50).

The historic fabric means a glassed off area is not possible (and I'd feel massively excluded in an aquarium every week!). There's only one area out of the church where smaller children could play (so they couldn't run a creche at the same time as Sunday School). We'd also feel pretty excluded if we couldn't go on non-Sunday School weeks (which is probably 15-20 weeks of the year), and I wouldn't bother if we had to be in an area with "piped church", also. It's not a "praise band" church where listening through an audio or video link gets you the flavour of church, it's a trad but (we thought) friendly church with old fashioned liturgy.

OP posts:
SquidgeyMidgey · 15/02/2016 16:03

Fanjo why so angry then? You're the one making up nonsense- I work my socks off with LD kids yet according to you I'm disablist! What the hell are you on lady, because it's not tea. The OP sat on her backside while her kid upset the congregation and she's got her backside in her hand because they dared to complain. That's not an SN mum struggling when all her strategies have failed, that's bad parenting.

honkinghaddock · 15/02/2016 16:04

"If he is capable of throwing and catching a teddy, he is capable of sitting and having a bit of manners"

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 15/02/2016 16:04

Maybe that wouldn't work for OP. Maybe doing that with the toy is him being the least disruptive he can be. Perfectly possible.

gooseberryroolz · 15/02/2016 16:05

Sorry, I'm not sure what happened there Hmm

Thornrose · 15/02/2016 16:06

Also, a friend of mine now has a son (12 maybe) with severe autism (he doesn't speak), but he manages to sit quietly and play on his ipad thingy during Mass.

What's your point here? It sounds as though you are saying if one child with autism can do that then they should all be able to?

If that is what you're saying then the This is my child campaign is aimed directly at your type of thinking.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 15/02/2016 16:08

I'm angry at reading this sort of sanctimonious thread yet again on MN tbh.

For some sort of working with kids with Sn guru you do seem to spout the myths a lot.

helerevg · 15/02/2016 16:10

Coming back to the original post... may I suggest that the poster has a quiet word with the vicar to explain the boundaries that can reasonably be expected of her child - she is the expert after all - and see what accommodations can be made by all concerned so that her family can remain welcome and contributing church members?

I remember with some humour a wedding that was very child-friendly, to the extent that twin toddlers discovered that their new shoes slapping on the ancient stone floor as they ran up and down the aisle echoed in a very satisfying way, so they kept doing it all through the service. Some people would have been horrified, but we had set the expectations in advance and the bride and groom had specified that they didn't mind noisy children, of which there were many. So, noisy, but not a problem.
Ash Wednesday Communion would have been a different matter...

gooseberryroolz · 15/02/2016 16:12

I'm angry at reading this sort of sanctimonious thread yet again on MN tbh.

Well I am FURIOUS at seeing SN parenting conflated with slack non-parenting yet again.

SquidgeyMidgey · 15/02/2016 16:14

Fanjo what myths? And I wish I was a guru for the benefit of the kids i work with. The child has no diagnosis, we have nothing to go on but a lazy parent saying she's looking into it. Interestingly enough, the OP used to get on another forum, before she adopted her two, and tell all us mere parents how we were doing it wrong and she knew better because she worked with children in a research setting. Shame she cba to use that marvellous knowledge on her own children.

Sirzy · 15/02/2016 16:19

A child with special needs still has special needs whether they are diagnosed with something specific or not. A diagnose just provides a label of what those needs are.

fanjoforthemammaries7850 · 15/02/2016 16:20

So because she has no diagnosis yet but is struggling she just be a "shit parent" and a "lazy parent".

Just lovely.

GruntledOne · 15/02/2016 16:20

The OP sat on her backside while her kid upset the congregation

No, she didn't. No-one who had RTFT could justifiably think that.

gooseberryroolz · 15/02/2016 16:21

What about the other child Fanjo?

The younger one who is running, climbing and being read aloud to during the sermon? No suspected SN there.

The parenting IS the common factor between the two DC.

biscuiteater · 15/02/2016 16:25

A difficult situation in churches, one which I think many CofE churches have. How to be fully inclusive without alienating the existing congregation. Church needs to cater for everyone. It sounds like they have made an effort with the toys and having a room available as well as the side chapel. Perhaps strategic use of the separate room when necessary? I have a toddler with SN and the only service I feel able to take him to is a louder informal praise style one where movement is encouraged. He also loves it. I wouldn't want to go to the quieter formal service with him because I would feel on edge and I wouldn't want to ruin the service for others, plus he would be bored. I leave him at home with my husband and go to that one by myself, which I enjoy. Nice to have some childfree time too. So I think compromises are the best way to go to keep everyone happy where possible.

nilbyname · 15/02/2016 16:33

What a totally bonkers thread!

squiz81 · 15/02/2016 16:36

I think a separate play area might be what causes the confusion for the kids, it looks like a play place...but they aren't allowed to play and make noise.

I don't have experience of a church. I'm a Jehovah's Witness we meet in a hall and our children sit with us for the whole meeting. I have a 4 year old a 20 month old. The 4 year old sits and does sticker books or something else quiet. The 20 month old looks at books. He can normally last 30 minutes of sitting quietly then I have to take him out. But i can still hear out in the foyer. Sometimes one of them will sit with someone else in the congregation.

How long is the service? Could you get them to sit with you and do something quietly? I think it's important you all go as a family and that should be encouraged. Jesus welcomed the little children when his disciples shoo'd them away (maybe remind your vicar Smile )

You'd always be welcome at one of our halls if you fancied a change Wink

SquidgeyMidgey · 15/02/2016 16:38

She wasn't struggling, she said she lets him run free because it's that or a tantrum. That's not supporting a SN child, that is being lazy. Someone please show me where it says what his AN are, what she was doing for him. She was indulging her right to worship in the church she wants to go to and stuff the congregation if they don't like it. THAT is what is unchristian. This thread is doing my head in, she's the sort who give SN parents a bad rep. I need a cup of tea.

GruntledOne · 15/02/2016 16:38

Squidgey, gooseberry: just how judgmental can you be? It is unfortunately the case that a high proportion of adopted children have special needs, and it is utterly irrelevant whether her child has a diagnosis: difficulties don't miraculously appear and disappear because you put a label on them. She's mentioned a number of things she did to quieten her children, one of which included letting the older one throw a teddy up and down whilst walking around in a partitioned off side chapel without his shoes on: as she pointed out, on any interpretation that's preferable to him going into a meltdown. Just because she uses methods other than the quiet soothing and distraction that gooseberry envisages - almost certainly because she knows (as would many parents of children with SN) that they don't work - doesn't make her this lazy, feckless parent you want to portray. And carrying across your resentments from another forum is below the belt.

The problem here seems to be that the church has family services which don't really seem to merit the name. So many supposed christians round here seem frankly highly intolerant and judgemental, and to feel that their right to go to services, even family services, without being disturbed by the dreadful sound of children, trumps the need to follow the teachings they purport to subscribe to. I think this vicar (and maybe a few others) need to invite their congregations to undertake a little examination of their own consciences rather than the conduct of others.

GruntledOne · 15/02/2016 16:41

Squidgey, we don't know the precise needs of this child. But if you think it is laziness that induces a parent to leave a child with, for instance, severe sensory and social problems and anxiety to play quietly in peace rather than push them into the massive distress that is the foundation of a meltdown, you are frankly indulging in lazy thinking yourself.

gooseberryroolz · 15/02/2016 16:49

Gruntled I have not in any way suggested that pre-dx needs are not real.

If you think it is judgemental to want to protect the vast majority of DC with SN from the expectations (and pre-judgement ) that people such as the OP create, then fine.

It doesn't sound like the most family-friendly service, it is true. But OP has declared herself hostile to most standard arrangements (creche, audio link etc) anyway. Do it's moot.

gooseberryroolz · 15/02/2016 16:51

She wasn't struggling, she said she lets him run free because it's that or a tantrum. That's not supporting a SN child, that is being lazy

Yes, that's what I read too.

BillSykesDog · 15/02/2016 16:51

Gruntled nobody's said that there shouldn't be any noise from children, just that consideration goes both ways. The OP will not take her children out no matter how disruptive they become. She sits in the main body of the church (she did say they sat in the main body during the sermon later in the thread from the reading comment) and reads aloud to her children during the sermon.

This isn't a church which isn't welcoming for families; they have a family area in the church, Sunday school, lots of families attend (and incidentally I haven't seen the OP call it a family service). This is clearly a church where families are welcomed. It's also been tolerated for a long time without comment. Which to me indicates that the behaviour must be pretty extreme for it to have got to this point.

I mean, reading aloud during the sermon? That's nothing to do with the children, that's the mother being entirely inconsiderate.

Fidelia · 15/02/2016 16:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

waterrat · 15/02/2016 16:58

Haven't rtft. But I think we can be certain jesus wouldn't have minded kids making noise.

LeaLeander · 15/02/2016 16:59

To those saying, in effect, "children are just as much a part of the congregation as adults and have every right to be there no matter their capacity for being quiet/sitting still/letting others pray in peace" etc. I would point out that actually, in society and in most religions, kids do NOT have the same status as adults.

Adults have greater responsibilities in society and in their religious life and as such also have greater privileges, one of which is to have their needs for a serene, sober and distraction-free as possible environment in which to worship, prioritized over the childen's needs to run around and play. That is why most religions have various rites of passage - first communion, confirmation, bat mitzvah, etc. - to denote the difference between a little child and a functional member of the congregation.

Just as various cultures have secular rites of passage such as 16th birthday or 18th or 21st, whatever is significant in one's group), quinceanera, debutante balls, and coming of age traditions that require adolescents demonstrate a particular skill such as hunting etc. Pretty much every group of humans has established customs and traditions that indicate kids are not equal to adults. And pretty much every religion has a tradition of quiet, contemplative worship. It's not like the vicar in the OP's story is some eccentric who's dreaming up exceptionally high standards for kids in his parish.

The point is that ordinary church services are the province of confirmed, adult or at least near-adult members of the congregation. It's nice if younger children can behave well enough to remain during the service but if they are distracting, they should be taken out in deference to the people the church is actually serving during that period of time.

I realize many churches are desperately clinging to members as interest in religion wanes and are therefore willing to put up with antics that would have been unthinkable a generation ago - the same thing happens in restaurants and other public venues due to an increasingly competitive environment - but just because circumstances force the clergy to grin and bear it doesn't mean it's right to subject fellow members to inappropriate, distracting and disrespectful behavior. As others have pointed out, kids CAN be taught to sit still if the parents are willing to put in the effort.

Swipe left for the next trending thread