This thread is bristling with not so-unconscious bias. Like the baby names forum, which is eternally afire with class anxiety. About 80% of the posts are essentially 'Is X too 'chavvy' or, alternatively 'too try-hard'?' There is only a particular 'band' of names which are considered to neither flaunt their working-classness too loudly (not names like Nevaeh-Lillie or Perri-Rose) or too aspiration (not too posh like Ptolemy or Araminta), and so are acceptable.
Someone up the thread said Treylon was a 'trailer trash' name. Someone else asked whether Treylon's parents were black. And how it would be less unacceptable if it was slightly rearranged as the Cornish Trelyon, because Cornwall evokes nice, middle-class holidays and Boden catalogues.
And all covered over in faux-anxiety about whether little Treylon's CV will be tossed on the rejection heap because of other people's prejudices. Which are in fact being reinforced by those kinds of threads.
I don't particularly like the name Treylon, either, I hasten to say, but then neither do I like George, which to me is a 'podgy, stodgy, red-faced Hanoverian king after too much port' kind of name. But I don't go about thinking everyone else should share my dislike, telling the parents of newborn Georges, or imagining that my dislike has some kind of objective value...