There's a statistic widely quoted that cites that approximately 50% of mainstream educated kids go on to further education whilst close to 75% of home educated ones do. I'll try to dig out the source when I have more time.
Whether that's true or not, I'd suggest it's fair to say that home ed kids tend to come from more affluent middle class backgrounds where one parent can afford to take time out of work, and the nature/nurture link between such a background educational outcomes is well documented.
Certainly for primary level education from an academic standpoint, there's a plethora of teaching resources available to home educators, directly tied to curriculum which make that a non-issue. Likewise social groups and sports clubs.
At the end of the day, I think it comes down to how smoothly you can interact with your child in a learning capacity. If it works for you then I find it impossible to see how a 1:20+ teaching ratio in mainstream schooling can ever create a richer academic development environment than a 1:1 home schooling environment tailored to the individual.
I'm doing it, originally planned for 6 months to bridge schools, and I was terrified to begin with. I'm now planning to extend because although my son was top of his class in mainstream schooling, his academic progress (including, crucially, love of learning) has just skyrocketed.
Good luck with whatever you decide to do OP it's a big decision 