Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Original poster

The Oxford English dictionary should add "could of"

223 replies

DyslexicScientist · 16/12/2015 14:09

Everyone knows what it means, and quite a lot of people use it. Just seems very stuffy to not add it. English is an adaptive language.

They've already added omg and a smiliey face was the word of the year. So they are not adverse to change.

OP posts:
Original poster
DyslexicScientist · 16/12/2015 14:09

And "should of"

OP posts:
overwhelmed34 · 16/12/2015 14:11

Yabu Xmas Shock

Gottagetmoving · 16/12/2015 14:11

It doesn't 'mean' anything.

ghnocci · 16/12/2015 14:12

No. No no no no.

TheCarpenter · 16/12/2015 14:12

YABU

BrianButterfield · 16/12/2015 14:12

The OED might well add 'could of'. They are not guardians of the English language, they merely record it's usage. They added OMG as it is a word that is used in English, not because they regard it as 'proper' or believe it should be used.

TheSeptemberIssue · 16/12/2015 14:13

Why should they add a lazy alternative which is two letters short of the actual words?

OfaFrenchmind2 · 16/12/2015 14:13

YABU.
Seriously, do people have standards nowadays?

Seeyounearertime · 16/12/2015 14:13

Well OP you could of given a definition and you should of really.

BrianButterfield · 16/12/2015 14:13

I DID NOT ADD THAT APOSTROPHE IN ITS! Damn autocorrect!

reni2 · 16/12/2015 14:14

They should add wha'evva, too then, "Everyone knows what it means, and quite a lot of people use it.".

Indantherene · 16/12/2015 14:15

Just because some people can't write correct English doesn't make it right.

Goingtobeawesome · 16/12/2015 14:15

No fucking way

Could of is an affectation. It sounds shit. It jars. It's wrong.

MaisieDotes · 16/12/2015 14:16

People say "could've", "would've" and "should've" and that's ok.

Writing it down as "could of" is incorrect.

It won't be in the dictionary. Ever.

0PHELIA · 16/12/2015 14:16

NOOOOOOOO

And

DFOD

BrianButterfield · 16/12/2015 14:16

They will add any word that gets used sufficiently often to be recognised as a word in English. They do not distinguish between words people approve of or not.

GrouchyKiwi · 16/12/2015 14:17

YABVVVU

They should add YABU, though.

helenahandbag · 16/12/2015 14:17
Shock

No! Even seeing it written here makes me want to punch my own teeth out.

YellowOfficeBlock · 16/12/2015 14:17

Absolutely no way!!

If I read anything that uses "could of" "would of" etc it just jumps out at me immediately as wrong and then I can't take seriously whatever is being said.

goodnightdarthvader1 · 16/12/2015 14:17

No. It's a written mistake based on an aural (hearing) pronunciation. "ve" sounds like "of" to (lazy) ears.

EvaBING · 16/12/2015 14:18

No way.

MaisieDotes · 16/12/2015 14:18

brian "could of" isn't a word.

0PHELIA · 16/12/2015 14:18

PLEASE LOOK AT THIS

overwhelmed34 · 16/12/2015 14:19

Next they will be adding 'another thing coming' (ouch hurts my brain just to type!)

0PHELIA · 16/12/2015 14:20

It's called "Future perfect tense".