The thing that really pisses me off, Sock, is that you are still a carer despite working three days (and I bet you're caring for a damn sight more than 35 hrs a week, even working).
IME, it's the total lack of recognition of the impact that caring has on the carer once they magically earn over the threshold. My DH is still caring for me, he can't receive carers allowance as he earns over £100 a week, but he is still caring and its extra exhausting precisely because he is working over £100 a week.
I really think if a requirement for carers allowance, is that you have to care for more than 35 hours a week, you should be compensated for this number of hours (in fact as a lot of us know it's more 24/7). If your time is taken up by caring, you cannot be employed elsewhere within these hours, and despite what some dicks are saying on here if you weren't undertaking this caring responsibility, social services or similar would simply have to put measures in place.
This is a subject close to my heart today as my DH hasn't been able to go to work as I just can't get up unaided. He won't be paid for today. If he is off again tomorrow, it's another days wages lost. I know he's worried about losing two days pays, he is also worried I will fall trying to get to the bathroom if he goes in. He is under incredible strain at the moment, he looks ill himself, and this is the reality for many other carers every single day.
Caring responsibilities mean carers cannot earn elsewhere but still need an income to live. Why can't the government realise this? Well they realise it don't they, but they don't give a fuck, basically.