When I emailed (hence I have a written record of it) the ERO Itsallgoingtobefine my tenants had moved out, and I was paying 100% Council Tax for the property, as is the rule in Scotland. The ERO then stated that it seemed as if I was eligible for the Electoral Roll based on the property at the same time that he was removing me from it, but would not revise his decision to remove me because I was one day over the two week period for responding against his decision. An appeal against refusal to the Electoral Appeals Officer was also refused, and no reason given for this. So to reiterate, I was removed from the Electoral Roll on a date that I was eligible to be on it, and in the period leading up to it, while I was still eligible to be on it, I argued that I should not be removed, but was still removed.
Whether or not the authorities want to get into the situation of whether a British citizen, employed in two countries at the same time and therefore a British taxpayer (I pay my other tax to the EU) is adjudged not to be living in a property they own and pay Council Tax for, is up to them. I would have thought it would have been quite easily resolved by not making such decisions (to remove people from the Electoral Roll) on two weeks notice, following one letter.
In constitutional terms then, you have the State insisting on its constitutional rights, such as payment of taxes, but at the same time, removing, or making the right of exercise, of the right of representation very difficult. I would say that it is unconstitutional to remove someone's entry on the Electoral Roll so close to a General Election under such a timescale, because of the problems it brings.
I had to then act very quickly to ensure I registered in time to vote in the General Election somehow, and since the ERO seemed so exceptionally reluctant to permit me to vote where I paid Council Tax in the UK, I thought it safer to register as an overseas elector.
Its not up to me as a citizen to interpret things the ERO did not say, but should have done. I had absolutely no idea there was such a problem with postal votes - why would I? But I have certainly been put in this position by the idiotic action of the Scottish Government in writing to local authorities urging them to revise the electoral register so close to a General Election, without putting safeguards in place or fully thinking through the possible consequences.
I have done nothing wrong. In fact, I have been jumping through hoops to make sure I did everything right and within the correct timescales for the General Election, and at the present time, I still have no vote (hasn't arrived today). Clearly I did have a vote, which should have arrived at my property, and this right has been taken away from me, five weeks before a General Election.
Obviously, when constitutional rights such as voting are involved, you would expect the State not to make the exercise of those rights excessively difficult, as in removing them shortly before a General Election without a proper hearing of all the relevant facts.c ad