I've been following some threads on weight loss and snacks lately as my diet isn't great and I need to make some changes, so have been following for some tips. Sometimes a lot of advice on these threads comes across to me as a little 'extreme' or very radical. As in, you often get people talking about how they never snack, or eat mainly seafood and vegetables and stir fry, say. The threads can go a bit round in circles – "snacking is just a lack of willpower, processed food is evil, carbs are terrible for you" etc.
Now I'm not questioning that this isn't just a very healthy way to eat – I'm sure it is probably one of the healthiest ways to eat. (And this isn't meant as a criticism of people who enjoy eating those foods, or people who have to eat a more restricted diet)
But it got me thinking about what people I know eat (colleagues and friends) and it seems to be the same. The general attempt is to eat relatively well, to have fruit and veg, and to have decent meals where possible. When you go to someone's for a meal or you share recipes, the general aim is something relatively healthy, or at least with fresh ingredients and vegetables. But they are also still eating biscuits in the office, still happily getting a cake in a café, and talking about having had a chippie takeaway one night.
I know the ideal would be to cut out processed food, but AIBU to think that actually, most people just eat quite well, try and get their five a day if they can, but still "indulge" - biscuits and desserts and takeaway and alcohol - sometimes? That most people just live in a middle ground between eating terribly and eating super healthily?