Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

in finding the term 'indie' for fee paying schools slightly cloying

87 replies

ZammoMcGuire · 11/01/2015 16:32

its as if all the pupils wear black coats and DMs all the time

OP posts:
FailOfTheCentury · 11/01/2015 17:02

I think that if you fail to make the distinction, Zammo, you risk losing sight of the fact that our leaders disproportionately come from a very small subset of very expensive private schools. A large proportion of the middle classes at this country have had at least some private education but they still have more in common IMO with people educated in the state system than with ex-public school boys.

fairgame · 11/01/2015 17:03

My son goes to an 'indie' school.
It's an indie special school so it is a fee paying school but fees have to be paid by local authorities. Rich parents cannot pay for their children to attend.

I don't mind it being called 'indie', it's shorter than 'independent' or 'non-maintained'. It's certainly not a private school though.
The uniform is navy jumpers and navy polo shirts so DS does look a bit 'indie' but saves me trying to wash out stains from white shirts!

ZammoMcGuire · 11/01/2015 17:04

meh independent/ public - same thing to me esp wrt politicians

OP posts:
ilovesooty · 11/01/2015 17:04

I agree and like other posters I can't stand uni either.

ZammoMcGuire · 11/01/2015 17:05

iirc UNi started from neighbours etc - I watched it when I was at University and they said it and we didn't.

OP posts:
SisterMoonshine · 11/01/2015 17:07

I think it's come in because people get confused by the term 'public' school.

SuburbanRhonda · 11/01/2015 17:10

Interesting how this thread has gone.

I pointed out the twee-news of the term "indie" on a thread a few months back and got torn to shreds.

Smile
SuburbanRhonda · 11/01/2015 17:12

twee-ness

Blush
FailOfTheCentury · 11/01/2015 17:12

IME the type of private day school I went to is full of children whose parents would be happy to put them in a state school in another area where the schools were less shit, whose parents massively struggled to find the money for the fees, but who thought it was worth the sacrifice for the academic advantage. Yes, they were mostly well-off compared to the average person, but it just doesn't compare to the kind of social advantage you buy by sending your kid to Eton or Marlborough or Rugby.

katese11 · 11/01/2015 17:15

I've only heard it on here but I would assume that Jarvis Cocker would be the headmaster....

MassaAttack · 11/01/2015 17:15

Yanbu.

It makes it sounds as if the parent is embarrassed that state schooling isn't good enough for their children. That, or they're afraid of misspelling independent.

Independent suggests non-mainstream, edgy perhaps, different. Private schools are no more likely to be any of these things than state ones.

morethanpotatoprints · 11/01/2015 17:17

It is confusing though, the whole system

Even state education is confusing these days, well to me anyway.
There seems to have been lots of changes in recent years.

I have always thought that Public Schools are the poshest and the ones where the really rich send their kids to be politicians or Lawyers.

I thought private/independent were those that wanted to pay/ were able and sometimes/ mostly they received a better education to what state school received.

I get confused with charity schools that charge fees, free schools, academies, grammar, ss, etc.

I know what they are basically, but couldn't hold an informed discussion on the pros and cons as either not experienced them myself, or some aren't offered in my area.

FailOfTheCentury · 11/01/2015 17:21

Edited my post too much and fucked my tenses up.

Has anyone disagreed yet that "indie" is cringey? Grin

lottiegarbanzo · 11/01/2015 17:25

I believe Damon Albarn went to grammar, not an indie, as it happens.

(I also don't classify Britpop as 'indie', it's mainstream pop). Anyway...

ZammoMcGuire · 11/01/2015 17:26

lol at Jarvis cocker

OP posts:
ZammoMcGuire · 11/01/2015 17:26

i was going to nominate Ian Astbury as art teacher but he is Goth, I suppose shows age

OP posts:
MassaAttack · 11/01/2015 17:26

I agree lottie - Britpop was not indie.

duchesse · 11/01/2015 17:29

"indie" is a horrible word. I just think that it's written by people who are unsure how to spell indypendant inndependant independent indapindant-- indie.

squoosh · 11/01/2015 17:29

YANBU.

'Indie' should be the preserve of films and music. Just call it 'school' ya eejits, no need to declare to the world what type of school you send your kids to.

squoosh · 11/01/2015 17:30

99% of Britpop was a load of old rubbish.

NewYearsHangoversHurtAlot · 11/01/2015 17:30

He didn't go to Grammar he went to the local comp

ZammoMcGuire · 11/01/2015 17:31

¡ independiente!

OP posts:
MassaAttack · 11/01/2015 17:31

Jesus and Mary Chain would be the DT department I reckon. That or PE.

anothernumberone · 11/01/2015 17:31

I find the public school thing a bit mad. In Ireland we call private fee paying schools 'private school' and all non fee paying schools are public schools. Then again we call university and all non university higher education colleges 'college' not university which is equally as random. I like 'uni' and 'indie' they work well, but 'public school' not so much.

Newshoesplease · 11/01/2015 17:32

Was just thinking the same lottie, blur weren't signed to an independent label. Not indie.

"Indie schools" is a confusing term. (As is public schools. ..they're not particularly available to all of the public).