Except Tiggy, our la advice is only saying:
"‘If a child of compulsory school age who is a registered pupil at a school fails to attend regularly at the school, his parent is guilty of an offence’.
But if your child has say one holiday every year, but is otherwise there, then they'd had 97.5% attendance.
If they have two weeks holidays and otherwise 100% attendance, they'd still have 95% attendance.
How does the la prove that a child with 97.5% attendance does not have regular attendance?
I guess what I am asking you is what written evidence have you got of the next steps that will be taken? Is this you surmising or have you got it from somewhere? If so, can you please tell me where!
Just all the documentation I've seen mentions fines for holidays and then 'you could be prosecuted' with a lot of surmising and guesswork on both sides. I haven't actually seen any official documentation that actually states what will happen for repeat offenders.
I'm not being difficult, I would genuinely like to see the documentation / case studies or whatever is it that says repeat offenders will be treated more harshly rather than just pay another fine.
To use your driving analogy, I know a lot of mums see them more like parking fines. It doesn't matter how many times you break the rules, you get the fine and you pay it. End of.
I am curious as to what the official documentation actually says.