DH's car insurance is £1332 per year, we pay it monthly. He's been driving for 8 years, 3 points on his licence for speeding which he got 4 years ago. No claims, although haven't carried any no claims bonuses over as we usually change every year and go with the cheapest quote. Car is 12 years old, no one else on his insurance.
DSD just got car insurance after getting it free for the first year with her new car. She's 22, car is 1 year old, she has no points, but does have a claim as someone shunted into the back of her pushing her into the back of someone else's car earlier this year. Her car insurance is £1350.
She's been driving for 3 years, and has DH as a named driver on her insurance.
The only difference could be our postcodes I suppose, we live in an awful area with a high crime rate and she lives in a decent area with not as much crime. We both have drives.
I don't get it. I thought that ours would be much cheaper as DH is older, been driving longer and the car is older. I'm glad that she's managed to get cheap (well sort of) car insurance, but it makes me think DH's should be much cheaper?