Haven't read the whole thread, but it's not unreasonable to refer to an accent as "British".
In fact, it's a lot more accurate than trying to identify an accent from a particular county/region/city if you are not 100% sure exactly where the accent is from.
It's an umbrella term, if you like, and incorporates the whole variety of accents from the British Isles.
It's more about accuracy, probably. I think if they knew for sure that the accent was English, they almost certainly would have reported accordingly.
Very sad news. I fail how to see how reporting the accent as "English" could have made the news any better for you, OP [confused.]
What a bizarre post!
Have just read a few other posts. It sounds like it was particularly identifiable as English, perhaps.
Still, OP, don't get why it would make it all better for you if it was reported as English, but then I suspect I'm missing something and will read whole thread when I've got time.
Sorry if I've got the wrong end of the stick.