And she could always have made Jo wholesale with triplets later - I totally see the appeal of three Nina K Brisley toddlers, identical apart from their colouring, clinging to Jo's legs. I do see it. But making them the firstborns, the ones who are obviously going to be closely followed through to leaving school, is so short-sighted - especially when they're almost immediately labelled with a single characteristic each, so you can plot their stories many many years in advance. (Also, a singleton child would more likely have had a sensible choice of godmother. After Grace "Phyll" Nalder fetches up at Millie's, does she resume godmotherhood? Or had EBD forgotten that, along with her husband?)
I like the relationship between Robin and Daisy in the Armishire books, too. And I like that the school is very family-ish too - I like that Madge, Jo, Simone all at times combine teaching with mothering young children, like Simone's daughter playing on the lawn while she's teaching and stuff. It seems perfectly plausible (to my inexpert eye), esp in the wartime context, and it's very much like the family feel of the Tyrol books.
I really feel the loss of Madge in the later books, but tbh I'm not sure if the problem is that she's been effectively removed, or if it's who she's already become. I sometimes wonder whether EBD has tried and been unable to restore her to her former brilliance (thinking about Joey's letter about her becoming all 'crisp and fresh' in Canada and no longer 'that sweet Lady Russell', which perhaps suggests EBD knew the problem, but no amount of Joey saying Madge is back to her best manages to persuade me), and then eventually gives up and drops her. Bill and Madge are by far my favourite adult characters and I am somewhat surprised that both are abandoned in the latter half of the series.
OK, I must read Joey and Co. It's the artery-severing I'm sold on.