Just curious as to what others think about this incident, really...
I was at the park today with DH, both DSs and DPIL. DPIL were supervising DS1 (age 3) on the slide (DMIL at the top, DFIL waiting at the bottom - stay with me, this is relevant
) while I was on the other side of the park feeding baby DS1, with DH keeping us company. So I didn't personally see any of the tale I am now to relate...
I'm told by DPIL that DS1 went down the slide, and was immediately (ie no time for him to have got off the bottom) followed by another boy, age approx 5-6. So the older boy's feet hit DS quite heavily in the back - I'm told he cried at the time, but he's been fine since; it clearly wasn't a serious injury.
DFIL took exception to the older boy's apparent ignorance of slide etiquette and, noting that the boy's father was nearby (and had done nothing to either direct his DS's use of the slide, or get him to apologise to DS once it was clear he'd hurt him), he said to the boy "hey, you know you shouldn't come straight down the slide after other people like that - you will hurt them, like you did my grandson. You need to give them time to get out of the way. Your daddy should have told you that".
The boy's father replied directly to DFIL, something along the lines (I'm not sure) of "Hey, a direct conversation about this would have been ok, actually". I'm not sure if/how DFIL responded - I think he just shrugged/smiled (probably in a well-you-should-have-been-supervising-your-child-more-closely-in-the-first-place superior sort of way, if I'm any judge).
DFIL said that the next chance he got, the other father made "a rude face" at DFIL and flipped him the bird - in full sight of the children of both families. At which point DFIL laughed and said "Oh, you want me to swivel on that, do you?" and walked off. The other family retreated to the far end of the (large) playground and we had no further contact with them.
In my view, DFIL was perhaps a little out of line in addressing his somewhat PA remark to the child, rather than to the father for whom it was really meant, and then being a tad smug maybe about parenting "standards". OTOH, I think the other father was probably more at fault for not teaching his son how to use a slide considerately in the first place, not making his son apologise to another child that he then hurt (though accidentally, of course) and then being unreasonably aggressive about it when challenged.
However, I only have DPIL's account of the incident - not that I've any real reason to doubt them at all, but: they have both been known to get distressed at "modern" parents' failure to make their children conform to their own, fairly high (which I'm very happy with, don't get me wrong, me and DH are definitely more on the stricter side than the permissive) behavioural standards; they do get upset when they see DS1, who is their PFG, get hurt, however trivially; and DFIL, wonderful as he otherwise is, does have a temper on him. He usually has it well under control, but it's possible that he was more aggressive to the other parties in this incident than he and DMIL have led me and DH to believe.
So, what is the consensus please - was the other father being a dick, or are my PIL being UR in their expectations, or something in between...?