I just don't believe those figures on welfare spending
Figures from OECD. Feel free to independently check and report back.
www.oecd.org/dataoecd/56/37/31613113.xls (download)
There must be a difference in what is counted as welfare
The main social policy areas are as follows: Old age, Survivors, Incapacity-related benefits, Health, Family, Active labour market programmes, Unemployment, Housing, and Other social policy areas.
www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm
In much of Northern Europe, the ethos seems to be to benefit a larger swathe of the population, rather than providing a lifestyle for a benefits class.
Welfare spending UK:
Pensions 144bn
Healthcare 128bn
Education 89bn
Other welfare 113bn
Unemployment 6bn
www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/year_spending_2014UKbn_13bc1i_40#ukgs302
There is a real stigma on the long term jobless, and the thinking seems to be that they are mainly druggies and disaffected immigrants
Charming. FYI in 2013 2.52 million UK unemployed, 503,000 advertised jobs. You do the maths.
Scotland barely even has any motorways linking its cities - how can it possibly be a successful seperate country, moving people, goods and services around,
Are you serious?
. Of course when we leave our mud huts we don't venture beyond the wooden palisades of our villages, and we survive on food parcels helicoptered in from rUK.
And the abusive comments that you get on the streets, the drunk culture, is exactly what you get in England but not the rest of northern Europe.
I agree with this statement. I find it odd that you think this is a reason to remain in UK so that Scotland and England can be drunk and abusive together, rather than seek independence to build a new society with more positive values.