Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

OK, one vote each...

324 replies

ClockWatchingLady · 07/02/2014 21:55

Should schools/LEAs allow parents to take children out of school for a holiday (once per year, say) during term time?

There's been plenty of debate already, so let's just have a little show of hands so we can count up...

I say YES.

OP posts:
Frusso · 09/02/2014 11:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

curlew · 09/02/2014 11:10

"seems like if you have to use state schools you just have to agree to follow someone else's rules for your own children."

What a very odd statement. Particularly when you only apply it to state schools-have you experienced the rules in most private schools?????? They tend to go a bit beyond send your child to school on school days and do!5' give them coke and a Mars bar for lunch!

Bowlersarm · 09/02/2014 11:59

if you have to use state schools you just have to agree to follow someone else's rules for your own children

Well of course you do. There are too many families at schools for each family to make up it's own rules about when they should go, how long the DC should spend there, what they should do whilst they are there etc.

What do you think they should be doing?

If you don't like the system, it is perfectly legal for you to take your dc out of that system and you could home educate.

Or you could use your vote to elect the government who would most closely reflect your views, to try to get things changed.

ClockWatchingLady · 09/02/2014 12:02

With the new additions:

No: 101 (42%)
Yes: 141 (58%)

OP posts:
Maryz · 09/02/2014 12:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

wildwesterly · 09/02/2014 12:26

Yes because of the double standards.
When schools stop illegally excluding children that want to be in school receiving an education then fair enough. But education is either important for all children or it's not. Some HT's happily use their 'discretion' when it suits but woe betide you if you choose to do the same.

HoratiaDrelincourt · 09/02/2014 12:44

Tempted to naughtily sockpuppet and have eleventy votes Wink Grin

dayshiftdoris · 09/02/2014 12:45

No

Other than exceptional circumstances

fedupfedup · 09/02/2014 12:47

No

SantanaLopez · 09/02/2014 12:48

It's funny though, a lot of the 'no' and 'yes' are actually saying the same things, a lot of people say 'no, but with X and Y as an exemption' and 'yes, for X and Y'.

CheesyBadger · 09/02/2014 12:48

Yes

curlew · 09/02/2014 13:19

"When schools stop illegally excluding children that want to be in school receiving an education then fair enough."

Say more?

CMP69 · 09/02/2014 13:23

No

DioneTheDiabolist · 09/02/2014 13:27

Yes.

DS's school is ok with it as long as the child's attendance is good and it's only once a year. They have a much bigger problem with days off here and there than holidays. I was Shock when I found out that some children had missed as much as 8-10 weeks of school due to duvet days.

Thetallesttower · 09/02/2014 13:32

Yes

I need to go to visit my children's family in another country. I'm still paying off last summer's debt when we traveled in the summer holidays. Year before, it cost 1/4 of the price. Not sure what to do this year- not see grandparents?

dontcallmemam · 09/02/2014 13:44

Yes, but only a) in Primary school b) at HT's discretion c) if above 90% attendance.

No for senior school.

starballbunny · 09/02/2014 13:46

Mary puts it perfectly, it punishes exactly the wrong sort of parents, the ones who care deeply about education and their family's well being.

The vast majority of us have no choice, but to use the state system.

The vast majority of people can neither afford to go private or to HE.

I'm lucky enough to be able to afford to be a SAHM, but even so I'd an awfully impatient reception teacher and clueless at MFL, English, Art and Drama. And anyhow, DD1 needs and DD2 enjoys the social side of school.

For the vast majority of DCs and their families state school is the one thing in life you cannot escape. Legally children have to receive an education and their allocated school is often the only way this can happen.

Not surprisingly having no choice means people get very angry when they feel the government and/or HTs are abusing their position and being petty and controlling.

MrsKoala · 09/02/2014 14:39

Yes.

wildwesterly · 09/02/2014 14:43

curlew can't say much more at the moment I'm afraid. Lets just say that I'm aware of actions that schools might take to avoid accurately recording and therefore 'hiding' absences to make it look better for them. In the meantime a child suffers socially and educationally because of their actions.

There seems to be no fine or consequences for the school yet if a parent kept a child out of school for that amount of time they would be fined and taken to court. There's a lot of publicity about fines for parents breaking the law but not much about schools breaking the law.

ArgyMargy · 09/02/2014 14:51

No.

curlew · 09/02/2014 14:54

Ah. A conspiracy.

Dwerf · 09/02/2014 15:03

Yes. I think you'll get a skewed view of the actual support for 'no' on Mumsnet. Because a lot of people on here will be able to afford the more expensive holidays no problem. But they'll be happy consign poorer children to never having a holiday abroad.

Or at all. If I scraped up all year I could possibly afford a term-time holiday at Pontins or something, but not in the school holidays.

2014ThisIsMyYear · 09/02/2014 15:12

No

sarber · 09/02/2014 15:13

Yes

2014ThisIsMyYear · 09/02/2014 15:19

Is a holiday abroad a basic human right these days? I'm aware holidaying in the UK isn't any cheaper, BTW. There are options: shorter holiday, different type of holiday, no holiday in alternate years, etc. It used to be called living within your means.

Swipe left for the next trending thread