Why is it that the fox hunting debate always ends in hysteria?
Drag hunting is just much fun and often with better planned routes for the participants, it dpesn't however do anything for control of the fox population. If there were a better way of ensuring that the old or infirm foxes could be separated and humanely destroyed then that would be far better, culling does not do this. In any natural habitat predators ensure that for the most part survival of the fittest reigns. Historically there is always a problem when this isn't the case.
Humans have for quite some time been a predator for the fox and through hunting and farmers protecting their livestock this has done a reasonable job, if not to the taste of the wider population.
For the record the vast majority of modern hunts did not end with foxes being torn limb from limb, if the fox was caught it was shot, some hunts allow the hounds the remains, most don't from what I've heard/seen.
I firmly believe that the only reason the fox hunting saga gained such attention and revile is because it has been perceived to be the sport of the wealthy and entitled. Of course the very idea of anyone gaining pleasure from intentionally harming an animal doesn't sit comfortably with many people either. Hunting is far more than a bloodthirsty sport for toffs and sadists though and too much propaganda has been used from the anti's for any rational debate to take place.
I also personally feel that the cases of animal cruelty, neglect and abuse in domestic settings are far worse than anything seen on the hunting field, never mind the conditions frequently seen in the meat and animal produce side of things.
Unfortunately for the animal population of the world we are a dangerous and often cruel species to be around. The fox comes off rather lightly in comparison.