I genuinely don't know whether I am here, so be gentle!
I have a 4 year old DSS and a 21 month old DD.
As it is half term, my DP has taken most of the week off to spend with DSS, who is coming to stay for the week.
My DD broke out in chicken pox this morning. It is a very mild dose so far - just about 10-20 blisters at the moment. She is not bothered at all!
Out of courtesy, we told DSS's mother, who has forbidden him from visiting us this week and won't even let DP go over there to see him in case he infects him.
Obviously, chicken pox isn't great and should probably be avoided. However I felt a sense of relief when 8 yr old DS got it aged 3 and now when DD got it because in my book it's one of those childhood things that needs getting out of the way.
My argument is:
- DSS was here all weekend and spent the whole day with DD before the spots appeared. If he was going to be infected by DD, in all likelihood he already has been.
- He is at school now and the chances are, he will get it in the next couple of years. As it's most contagious before anyone knows they have it, it's pretty bloody hard to avoid it.
- He is a strong, healthy boy. He is unlikely to have any severe complications.
Now, I would hate to see DSS suffer, of course I would, but I also think that DP has planned a whole week and to have that cancelled when in all probability in 2 weeks time DSS will break out anyway having already contracted it from DD and it is a real shame.
I think DSS's mum is being a bit paranoid and was wanting to persuade her to reconsider.
Feel free to say I'm being reckless with the health of DSS and heartless to boot, but I just want a straw poll of opinion on this.
Thanks.