I don't know about anyone else, but I'm a bit
at all the people rushing to the defense of the payday loan companies and the named one in particular. Really?
This story isn't about denying people in temporary (or perpetual) money problems short term loans, its about offering an alternative without terrible interest and terms and conditions like CPAs. What's not to like? Fair enough, be sceptical whether they will appeal to people or be sufficient, but its hardly "nanny state" or even "nanny church" to offer a less exploitative option. If it works as the church/credit unions want it to, then they will out compete the PLCs - sounds very fair and capitalistic if you are into that kind of thing.
I'm finding it difficult to think of a scenario where resorting to payday loans would ever be preferible to a small loan from a credit union, if access to the latter could be improved.
If you could afford the payday loan, then surely its better to get it at more advantageous rates and terms? And if you are either borderline able to afford it or not able then surely it would be better to go to people who will help you to work out what you can afford, help you manage your money by encouraging you to save and direct you to sources of free, independent money advice if you are struggling - as opposed to going to people who will encourage you to borrow money at high interest rates and be pursued for it through continuous payment authorities, etc. People who want you to make them as much money as possible.
There is also the problem that advertising such freely available credit, will encourage people to take out loans they don't really need, for things they don't really need, to act impulsively to buy things which aren't really essential. I really doubt that all the people who take out payday loans would otherwise have gone to loan sharks. My friend, who got married this month, took one out to pay for little bits and pieces for the wedding. I am certain that if pay day loans weren't available, she either would have done without these things, planned and budgetted for these things earlier, or borrowed from her parents who were funding other aspects of the wedding.
I was worried about her when she told me, as I hadn't realised things were so tight. So, she's got to find that £500 that she couldn't find this month, and £70 on top of that to pay for the privelage of spending the money a few weeks before she had the money too.
Goodness knows what the long term affects of these little extras will be.
I realise other people borrow the money for essentials such as car repairs, bills etc, but surely that suggests they are even less able to afford it.