Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Best name suggestion I've seen for the newborn drain on the taxpayer...

737 replies

SolidGoldBrass · 23/07/2013 23:16

I popped into a pub this afternoon for a wee and a pint and they had a Royal Baby Name sweepstake board behind the bar.

Someone had suggested 'Dodi.' Grin

OP posts:
BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability · 24/07/2013 21:32

Like cancer or a disability?

I have a disability, therefore I am better than anyone who doesnt have one, and you should all curtsey and call me ma'am. Hmm

I've already said elsewhere though, I'll have to outsource all of my ribbon-cutting.

SunshineBossaNova · 24/07/2013 21:35

Link here about the royal finances

TimeofChange · 24/07/2013 21:36

I find this thread distasteful because I try to live my life peacefully, to wish ill or harm on anyone, to not be jealous of what others have, and to treat others with respect.

There is a lot of respect missing here on this thread.

I am not a Royalist.
I have communist leanings, but won't be killing anyone in the revolution.

Ledkr · 24/07/2013 21:39

People are so desperate to make their point on this that they are prepared to use metaphorical cancer and disabilities.
I've suffered both in real life and its a lot harder than being a wealthy royal trust me.
Anyone noticed that the royalists have continuously go d on the attack whereas the republicans have not.

usualsuspect · 24/07/2013 21:40

I have no respect for the royals.

Why would I?

I'm sure they don't give a toss about me either.

BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability · 24/07/2013 21:42

"Anyone noticed that the royalists have continuously go d on the attack whereas the republicans have not."

^ that.

Alisvolatpropiis · 24/07/2013 21:44

usual

I'm not a raving Royalist, though I find this thread distasteful.

Is there anybody in the public eye you respect? Because in all likelihood they wouldn't give a toss about you.

ToysRLuv · 24/07/2013 21:44

Time: None of us want a violent revolution. Just equality. It's all well nit to want to offend, or whatever, but the republic won't build itself without discussion and voicing of opinions.

OneStepCloser · 24/07/2013 21:45

Great thread, but I'm with gordy and will stay here to start the Revolution.

DomesticCEO · 24/07/2013 21:46

BombJack, it's you that's misinformed I'm afraid. That video is a crock of shit - the monarchy costs us way more than 66p per year per person.

They have a very clever PR machine I'll give them that.

LimitedEditionLady · 24/07/2013 21:47

I have shown that i find it distasteful,i am not a royalist for the millionth time.Im sure a lot of people have posted theyre not royalist.Im not a bloody anything!I have only responded because I made an opinion and people responded so I responded.I think you "republicans"or whatever youve classed yourselves as have given just as much as an attack and it is all about not liking the royal family to you whereas its not aleays been the case with the people that have said its distasteful.

ToysRLuv · 24/07/2013 21:48

Even if it was 66 p, which it isn't, it's still 66 p too fucking much. I can think of lots more deserving causes.

DomesticCEO · 24/07/2013 21:49

I agree Toys, but this figure is soooo often quoted by royalists and it drives me mad. This does not include any security costs which are astronomical!

It's utterly disingenuous of the royals to perpetuate this crap.

LimitedEditionLady · 24/07/2013 21:50

Also i hope you enjoy your revolution,have a blast ill be very interested to read about it

valiumredhead · 24/07/2013 21:51

I know it wasn't directed at me but out made me think I'm not sure I respect any public figure...

valiumredhead · 24/07/2013 21:51

It not out

Alisvolatpropiis · 24/07/2013 21:53

I believe all heads of states (or leaders if you prefer) have security costs regardless of whether they're monarchs or not.

Pretty sure Obama's security costs are high. American tax payers will pay for that.

AndHarry · 24/07/2013 21:54

:( This thread is horrible. Poor baby.

LimitedEditionLady · 24/07/2013 21:54

Tbh i dont have anyone i think oooh theyre great in.the public light but theres noone I hate.I quite like being uninvolved with that kind of stuff.Its very calming.

flippinada · 24/07/2013 21:55

I don't have any personal dislike for the royal family, in fact I'm sure they are perfectly pleasant, maybe even, dare I say it rather nice should you ever meet them.

It's what they represent that people respond to - it's the apogee of unearned privilege.

LimitedEditionLady · 24/07/2013 21:57

At the same time,you cant help what you were born in to can you?Its just the way the world is.

flippinada · 24/07/2013 21:58

Prince George will perhaps be many things in his lifetime...but poor is not one of them!

ToysRLuv · 24/07/2013 21:59

The "world" isn't "like this", and we don't have to accept inequality unquestioningly. The UK CAN be different!

MaryKatharine · 24/07/2013 22:00

The country has gone mad!

It makes me laugh how the same posters who exclaim their disgust at their MPs possible pay rise seem completely unperturbed at the cost of one family.

valiumredhead · 24/07/2013 22:00

Tbh people who think 'poor baby' are missing the point ! It's not about the baby it's about the whole bloody lot of them

Swipe left for the next trending thread