Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think that 15 years sentence for Philpott is not enough?

131 replies

Missbopeep · 04/04/2013 11:17

15 years for the deaths of six children?

I thought you could get 15 years or life for one murder ( and yes, I know the charge was manslaughter.)

The term life is meaningless if it's only 15 years.

OP posts:
Shagmundfreud · 05/04/2013 08:12

Or even misogyny. Blush

Posterofapombear · 05/04/2013 08:30

Normally in these cases I would say that any sentence that could be given would be nothing compared to the punishment of having to live with the deaths of your children.

But they don't care do they? Not once have I seen either of them look genuinely upset. The defence haven't used their grief to prove lack of intent. There is not one shred of evidence that they feel anything for those poor children. It's unnatural.

Floralnomad · 05/04/2013 09:22

shag according to the Panorama programme all he did was the school run in the morning , he had little other involvement with the kids .I would love to think that they feel terrible but TBH his behaviour shows the opposite and surely if she felt that bad she would have stopped trying to protect him and told the police the truth .

ChazsBrilliantAttitude · 05/04/2013 11:15

Shagmund
If, as some people suspect, Mick Philpott has sociopathic tendencies he really could be unaffected by the childrens' death other than the impact it has on him and his way of life.

Its hard for us to comprehend but he may not have a normal emotional reaction to this at all.

ChazsBrilliantAttitude · 05/04/2013 11:22

PopeFrancis
Thanks for the info on intent. I will look up that case.

Welovegrapes · 05/04/2013 15:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page