"Your argument is like like saying that women in those countries manage without pain relief in chlidbirth so therefore women in the developed world shouldnt 'need' pain relief either"
OK - shall we compare women in the UK with women in Norway?
98% are breastfeeding on leaving hospital.
over 60% of them are still exclusively breastfeeding at 3 months.
80% are still breastfeeding at 6 months.
Canada - 55% of babies still breastfeeding at 6 months.
Australia - 57% of babies still breastfeeding at 6 months.
Sweden 67% still breastfeeding at 6 months.
And all of these countries had low breastfeeding rates 20 years ago. In all of these countries formula is freely available.
In 2005 (the last feeding survey) only 25% of six months old babies were still being breastfed in the UK, and most of these are being mixed fed.
It really is VERY shit here. Unusually shit. The experiences of breastfeeding in the UK are NOT representative or normal breastfeeding even in most Western countries.
"If it came to saying =- a baby should be BF but the mum cant do it/cope with it/ and will be under immense emotional pressure to actually care for that baby, Id say FF wins hands down?"
If a mum can't or won't breastfeed a baby still has to be fed. Formula is the only safe way to feed a baby who's mum won't or can't give her own milk. That kind of goes without saying. A mum has a right to not breastfeed, and not be criticised for not doing so. But on a wider stage that doesn't make it wrong for people to raise concerns about how few babies in the UK are being breastfed. Babies are still losing out, and judging from the experience of other Western countries, this really isn't necessary or inevitable. We can change things so that more women choose to feed their babies on their own milk.