What I think is wooly woo here is claiming people are smug for reading about parenting. Or saying people are a bit mad for following UP but at the same time ridiculing them or saying it must be crap if they are not following it correctly according to what they think it means. Or saying that most people muddle through and it's good but if you read UP then 'cherry pick' you are under some false delusion about either muddling through or cherry picking, and are an idiot for being so. Or being snide about how amusing it all is to see people genuniely just trying to do well and explain their perspective getting narked because they've been accused of being smug, ineffective, bringing up selfish brats, being inconsistent in their thinking and assuming they are better than everyone else.
For clarity: I don't assume I'm better than everyone else - I just assume that I'm doing better than I would do if I hadn't taken the time to think and reflect on what I am doing. I am NOT suggesting that if you don't read you aren't thinking about what you are doing; it's just that I use reading parenting books as part of that process. The absolute insistence that I am a mug for doing so is what I find hostile about this thread.
My child has to clean his teeth. It is non-negotiable, same as he has to walk on the pavement, not on the road. I have never threatened him with anything in order that he do so. I have never offered rewards to get him to do so. I have sometimes negotiated over how and when that will happen, but the framework for negotiation is usually quite limited. Sort of like he can walk in the middle of the pavement, or at the side, but not on the actual road, he can brush his teeth now or in five minutes, with this brush or that, we can put the toothpaste on with fingers or scrub it in, or he can do mine and I can do his. At no point do I show disapproval for him when he doesn't want to and I sympathise with him when he doesn't want to.
This is probably not very much different to what anyone else, UP or not is doing, but it is different if I just followed my instinct and told him it was happening now and got a bit shouty and irritable with him when he didn't want to. What I attribute to UP is the way it has taught me to sympathise with him in his desire to have just a modicum of control about his world, rather than see it as a challenge to me that I can win because I have more power and should win because I have more knowledge.
That this is not so very different from what 'common sense' people might do is not a failure of UP or of mine for misunderstanding it. It is proof that common sense isn't common to you if your own experiences of being parented aren't 'common'. And anyway, fuck common sense, that just means most people do it and since most people at various times in history have smacked their wives, believed in dragons, thought the universe revolved around the earth ec fucking cetera forgive me if I don't just assume that what people commonly believe is correct just because it's 2013 and we know a bit more than what we used to. I know we are all just doing the best we can, I'm just taking advice from a book rather than thinking I already know it all. Explain, please, why that makes me a mug? Or smug? or a bit mad?