Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

to think Rotherham council have lost the plot over UKIP foster-carers?

792 replies

londonone · 24/11/2012 09:23

bbc

I really really hope there is more to this than is being reported, otherwise I am utterly speechless.

OP posts:
Dawndonna · 24/11/2012 18:49

Just out of interest Cozy should Derby social services be sacked too?

londonone · 24/11/2012 18:49

Glitterknickaz - it wouldn't be a mumsne political thread if someone didn't try and relate it to disability! Surprised you didn't manage to shoehorn in the fact that DLA is not an out of work benefit,

OP posts:
MUM2BLESS · 24/11/2012 18:49

Things have gone wrong in the past with children in care. They have the childrens best interest at heart. The council is just being careful, I cannot blame them for that.

MurderOfGoths · 24/11/2012 18:50

"It is not clear from this report whether UKIP was deemed out of bounds in principle, or whether in this particular case the couple's expression of their political views was problematic. I have to say I'm not convinced that voting UKIP is incompatible with foster care. But fervent, vocal and uncompromising allegiance to the extreme end of those views might well be."

Absolutely.

gordyslovesheep · 24/11/2012 18:50

Jesus - so will UKIP help getting all the ex pats back to the uk then?

You do realise that immigrants don't get give handfulls of gov cash as a rule? They can get benefit if they from an UE member state - as can Brits in those countries ...

I would not want to see vulnerable children fostered by people who didn't want them in the UK - that is unlikely to be a nice welcoming environment

and what Mrs DV said really.

Glitterknickaz · 24/11/2012 18:50

Just pointing out the context of UKIP beliefs.
Someone else brought up the vision of 'quality' communities.
Whether that be on grounds of race, ability or lack of it.
Gives a sense of the ideology going on there.

londonone · 24/11/2012 18:50

Narked - did you not understand the question as you seem to be having a problem answering!

OP posts:
PessaryPam · 24/11/2012 18:51

Glitterknickaz

"Full of quality?"

I assume that is directed at me.

Australia recruits immigrants based on it's needs. This is a normal immigration policy. it doesn't want people with skills it doesn't need, or no skills or people who are too old. They are looking after their own interests.

Why is this impossible for us without being deemed racist?

KarlosKKrinkelbeim · 24/11/2012 18:51

"So a better solution would be to offer no assistance in their language at all? That would encourage integration would it?"

Life is too short to offer assistance to people who won't read. So I won't dignify this with an answer. intelligent readers will understand the contrasting positions the example was intended to illustrate.

FreudiansSlipper · 24/11/2012 18:52

what a child should be made to feel less equal then action taken how many children have to feel this way beforee action is taken

Makes far more sense that action is taken before by not allowing people to get the chance to project their hatred onto innocent people especially children

I think head teachers are allowed to sack a teacher if theynfind out they are a Member of the bnp, i am not sure i hope this is right i would rather that membership to such parties would be banned in some professions especially dealing with children

Dawndonna · 24/11/2012 18:52

Those of you who think that this is 'thought crime', do grow up. It isn't. It's about matching the right children with the family that is appropriate for them. Legal advice was taken. That would be impartial legal advice. Taken and followed. Yes there are times that the law is an ass (Guildford four and Birmingham six will always spring to mind). However, why put non uk children with people who support a party that have openly suggested repatriation? That isn't thought crime, that's a serious protection issue. If you are unable to see that, then obviously, you have a problem.

Glitterknickaz · 24/11/2012 18:52

Ooh.... ageism there too. UKIP, party of isms then.

londonone · 24/11/2012 18:53

Murder of goths- a better solution would be to provide English lessons and ensure people attend them.

OP posts:
Shallishanti · 24/11/2012 18:53

From what the head of children's services said on the bbc ws, I don't think they were ruled out on principle, just for these particular childre, but that doesn't fit the 'oh we're so discriminated against' vibe that some people like to play on

LineRunner · 24/11/2012 18:55

I don't think I can have got anything right, OP, when I am just asking questions.

I do personally think UKIP are guilty of a gormless policy statement error on 'the doctrine of multiculturalism', not unusual with a relatively inexperienced political party.

If UKIP had stuck with 'leaving the EU for economic reasons' there would be no issue today to discuss.

PessaryPam · 24/11/2012 18:55

FFS glitter, life with you must be one long line of offence at 'isms.

Do you suggest we fill this island with the worlds oldies too? We are having such a success with our own.

londonone · 24/11/2012 18:55

Oh dear glitter you must find he entire Australian nation ageist in that case.

Freudian - who would you have decide which views are acceptable and which aren't?

OP posts:
PessaryPam · 24/11/2012 18:55

And who pays for all this altruism glitter?

PessaryPam · 24/11/2012 18:56

You can so tell who works in the private sector in this thread.

flatpackhamster · 24/11/2012 18:56

MurderOfGoths

So a better solution would be to offer no assistance in their language at all? That would encourage integration would it?

How do you encourage integration by ensuring that a migrant can't speak English?

A better solution would be to require all migrants except successful asylum seeker claimants to pass an English test and to make that a mandatory part of being here.

Can't believe you're arguing that ensuring it isn't necessary to learn English in the UK promotes cohesion.

ElBurroSinNombre · 24/11/2012 18:56

The irony of this is that I'd bet that the foster parents are disenfranchised Labour supporters who feel betrayed and let down by Labour. And precisely because of this sort of thing.

londonone · 24/11/2012 18:57

Line runner that is what I meant I was agreeing with you and el burro that they are a single issue party and the rest of te policies are a bit of an afterthought

OP posts:
Glitterknickaz · 24/11/2012 18:57

It's not about offence. It's about being aware of some of the ignorance and hate that is doled out to some of the more vulnerable in society.

It's about accepting the people of this country for who they are not in terms of 'what they can contribute' which is entirely subjective anyway.

Dawndonna · 24/11/2012 18:58

Glitterknickaz - it wouldn't be a mumsne political thread if someone didn't try and relate it to disability! Surprised you didn't manage to shoehorn in the fact that DLA is not an out of work benefit
Did you mean to be quite so rude, OP?

londonone · 24/11/2012 18:58

I bet you can't pessrypam!

OP posts: