a) Not sure where this argument is stemming from? Nobody is suggesting the labelling of children, Merely providing the opportunity, should their parents agree, to receive the book around which our society was founded. And every parent imparts their beliefs/ideologies to their kids, one way or another. I don't 'label' my children' CofE children'. Are you suggesting Christians do?
b) ah the old religion vs. evolution chestnut. I am both CofE and believe in evolution, sorry not to fit into your convenient box. A view supported by the Archbishop of Canterbury, although his views are rather more nuanced than most. If you think there's a conflict between the two, then you've probably been reading too much Dawkins.
c) Actually love the atheist bus campaign. "There's probably no God". I actually thought that was hilarious.
I only became aware of the controversy from the atheist buses onwards though. (I never saw any of the first set, despite being a regular bus-user, not very memorable perhaps - or maybe I blanked them out!). I feel a bout the original crew probably something like moderate Muslims feel about Abu Hamza. That they're less than helpful, to put it mildly.
Anyway.
Tolerance and understanding of other people's religions might extend to not banning your children from reading the sacred texts of other religions though, surely? If my children would like to read the Koran, or the Humanist manifesto, the Gurū Granth Sāhib or anything, then that's fine. I'd be happy they wanted to engage with the question of spirituality (or lack of) after which they'd be better placed to draw their own conclusions.
The OP, on the other hand and several others on here are advocating censoring her children's exposure to such texts. Which would be a shame, I think.
db
xx