Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think this is the worsrt item of baby slogan wear i have ever seen

127 replies

McHappyPants2012 · 06/09/2012 22:43

gothamist.com/2012/08/18/finally_a_50_shades_of_grey_tie-in.php

why would you put that on a baby Shock

OP posts:
TroublesomeEx · 07/09/2012 13:10

Oh god, i've just had a text from my brother in which he referred to his 6 week old daughter as "my little princess" without a hint of irony.

I've got to tell him, haven't I!

DizzyKipper · 07/09/2012 13:16

The problem with taking an approach that aims to absolutely avoid gender stereotyping is surely you'll just be pushing your child into some other social construct. People will find a way to pigeon-hole whether we like it or not (this point I think takes me back to your point about doing things that elicit a response that is favourable to yourself at least).

But I don't think it's necessarily automatic to draw inferences. I find with myself that quite often I miss key bits of information, such as not noticing the clothes somewhere is wearing or if they've gotten a new haircut. I think partly that's to do with not being very observant, but also those type of things don't register highly on my list of priorities. I'd assume therefore that not everyone is necessarily going to notice what clothes your child is wearing or even think about it. If that's the case then maybe they'd just react to the child purely in the way that reflects how they feel towards children in general anyway, such as aloof if they're not a child person, or maybe bubbling with excitement and soppiness if they think children are amazing.

Even if we do automatically make inferences though we can still remind ourselves that they may not be correct, and just ignore the responses that other people give to our child if we don't feel they're favourable?

pictish · 07/09/2012 13:19

Personally I find tv merchandising on clothes the most unattractive of all.

Don't really get the outrage here - what actual harm can the slogan do?

I wouldn't buy it seeing as I thought 50 Shades was lame, and also that the joke on the vest is lame - but I don't find it offensive.

What's the problem?

TroublesomeEx · 07/09/2012 13:21

No I know, Dizzy.

For me it's more about how people will react to the child without being aware that they are doing it.

So not really something that many people would reflect on tbh.

DizzyKipper · 07/09/2012 13:22

Grin I think it's best probably not to, just leave him in his little bubble.

Should I admit now I also call DD my little princess? But I also call her my little soldier as well, so I'm assuming that evens it out - either that or I've committed double the atrocity.

pictish · 07/09/2012 13:23

Again - what actual harm can the slogan do?

DizzyKipper · 07/09/2012 13:23

I guess, do you ever point it out to them or do you just leave it?

TroublesomeEx · 07/09/2012 13:23

Grin you're probably right.

DizzyKipper · 07/09/2012 13:27

If you're asking me pictish, I don't think it actually does any harm. It's not to my taste personally, but I don't think there'll be any long term adverse effects from a baby wearing shades of grey slogans so personally I'd just ignore it.

pictish · 07/09/2012 13:28

So would I. I was just asking in general. I'm wondering where all the disgust on the thread is coming from...as in what people might think will happen as a consequence of a baby wearing it?
I can't think of one.

imnotmymum · 07/09/2012 13:29

Sorry did make me laugh Blush

StinkyPig · 07/09/2012 13:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

DizzyKipper · 07/09/2012 13:31

I just see it as a bit of a judgemental thing - people think that the parents are more or less likely to act in certain ways if they dress their child like this, but that doesn't mean they will. I've friends who dressed their little girl in rock and arnie type baby gros - again not to my taste but they're very good parents who obviously love her to bits, so I don't see it as an issue.

pictish · 07/09/2012 13:36

Yes...other than the judgement of the it's-not-to-my-taste-so-I'm-going-to-write-you-off brigade (and really, who cares about that?) - what other problems might be caused by this baby vest?

pictish · 07/09/2012 13:36

I mean - what's the complaining on here actually about?

pictish · 07/09/2012 13:41

Anyone?

imnotmymum · 07/09/2012 13:42

That the parents had sex...ooh really is that how the whole thing works. It tongue-in-cheek [have not read the book so hope that not a reference to anythingSmile

JamieandOscarSittinginATree · 07/09/2012 16:16

I think sloganising your baby as a way to express yourself is unfair on them and a bit lame.

JamieandOscarSittinginATree · 07/09/2012 16:19

Baies aren't objects and we don't own them they aren't here for us to use as a sales pitch for ourselves - to show how clever, funny or hip we are. That's why I don't like it. Prorbably no actual harm done in most cases, but it shows and attitude to children which I don't agree with

JamieandOscarSittinginATree · 07/09/2012 16:19

Babies

pictish · 07/09/2012 16:19

Unfair how? What effect will it have on baby?

JamieandOscarSittinginATree · 07/09/2012 16:21

Objectifying anyone means you may be not treating them with respect as an individual. I am aware that sounds a bit pompous but it's what I think. It's a bit sad if that's the only way you have to express yourself. Through your children.

JamieandOscarSittinginATree · 07/09/2012 16:22

xposts all over the place there, pictish.

Also, most of them aren't funny.

pictish · 07/09/2012 16:22

Why do you assume that people that buy these t-shirts have no other way of expressing themselves?

JamieandOscarSittinginATree · 07/09/2012 16:24

No, that would be an exaggeration. But of all the ways to express yourself, I don't think your child should be one of them.

Swipe left for the next trending thread