We were given a wedding present of a copy of titian's 'venus of urbino' by my little brother. Dh has protested it for years as he does not like my brother. It is quite large and dominates our living room.
Recently though he looked it up and as art goes it is considered a bit explicit due to the nude having her hand more or less at her private parts. I have to say I misinterpreted this as modesty but it is the opposite.
We have a three year old and a five week old. At ds1 birthday party some of the other parents tutted a bit and so have dh's family. I put this down to prudishness, lack of education, overly British etc etc.
Dh tried to wind me up tonight by saying social services would not approve!
I don't want ds1 to be exposed to anything that might be innapropriate but I don't want to buy into a culture of shame about bodies either.
Should I take the picture down? I am thinking a plain old nude is one thing but re examining this it is fairly erotic. I have no problem with my kids growing up one day obviously they will be exposed to sex education etc buti want to preserve their innocence. However I also don't want them to feel any shame or to be hemmed in by philistine like thinking.
Thoughts on this?