A few weeks ago I posted about how I'd given my DH for not taking more of an active roll in looking after DD (then 16 weeks) while we were at PIL's.
I did speak to him and tell him why I'd gotten nasty with him and he agreed he'd take more of a roll when we were at PIL.
Since then MIL has been diagnosed with a brain tumour, not a fatal one but it causes fits and she is very stressed (understandably). Anyway last week, we went over to see her with both children DS (8) DD (now 19 weeks). DS is a lively boy, but had been given death threats before we arrived and wasn't too bad, but DD wasn't tired and grumpy and not settling very well. So I was left to look after her and try to keep her quiet.
Now I understand DH was worried about his mum and wanting to see her, but afterwards I said that I wouldn't be going over again as it put too much stress on MIL (Who I love) and she was more than welcome to come to see us when she was feeling up to it.
Anyway DH and I agreed to go over this afternoon to see them, but then received a phone call to say that there might not be enough food for all as dinner was being provided by BIL. I then told DH I wasn't going, as I didn't want to cause any problems etc and also I felt that if MIL wasn't cooking she wasn't well enough (she's a feeder and usually wouldn't agree to letting others cook). FIL is also knackered after repeatedly having to take MIL to A&E so probably doesn't need the GC running all over either.
Also BIL has just had a little boy of his own who is 5/6 old who will be there, so felt she didn't need the added stress of my kids as well. Plus I didn't want to be walking up and down the hallway again trying to settle DD who would be shattered by the time we got there. (DD self settles in a cot and no where to put travel cot at MIL)
DH has been off with me since and doesn't understand why I couldn't have just sucked it up and put up with it.
AIBU? or do I have a point?