Have only read some early and late pages, so doubtless will repeat other's views!
I think that there is still a lot of charity in the population as a while - CIN, Sport Relief etc still do very well.
But direct collection has just changed so much since I was a child.
In part, I think we sometimes expect something for our donation - e.g. Sponsoring an event in Sport Relief.
In a way, I used to feel ( and sometimes still with some charities) that you got that from doorstep collections. Here we're people giving up their time to do something quite hard and boring. So I would donate from admiration for them, not just the charity. Almost like the collectors are a sponsored event!
But now charity is literally big business - and I do think it's chugging that has caused many of us to dislike charity collection. CA Week isn't chugging, but I suppose there's just so much of it, that it feels the same.
I tend to give most through JustGiving pages, and then some through collection buckets. I do not open my door to people, and I always so no to chuggers.
Even though I know it has been an effective way for charities to get donations, I can't get past my discomfort with another company profiting.
It is people giving their time and effort for free that inspires me to donate. I am generally humbled, and it's their demonstration of charity that prompts mine. Chugging can't have that relationship,