I think they've pulled everyone off the job as a damage limitation exercise - afterall their client is actually our insurer, who puts loads of work their way, so they can't be seen to take anything other than a very conservative approach I guess. Our Contract is with the insurer and the contractor is there as their representative in effect.
DH is going to speak to our loss adjuster tomorrow and I expect his opening words will be "WTF now?"
I very strongly suspect we'll end up with another contractor and builder. They didn't want the job - we were miles away from their main area but their first sub con builders were chucked off the job by them for being crap.
Currently we have no floor in the kitchen and diner, stripped back to first fix throughout the ground floor, no bathrooms, every carpet is up, no floor in the ensuite, two flights of stairs have been stripped of plaster, one staircase is about to be removed, and a garage conversion not even started. We haven't ordered a kitchen yet (the contractor has to do it as it's all insurance) and we put the claim in, in Aug 2011.
And the WORST thing is that all of the work was done in 2008 as the result of a previous flood, and the only reason we had this second claim, is that the building work was SO bad last time it's all got to be done again, plus fixing the additional damage done as a result of the poor works - the soil stack wasn't properly connected to the toilets etc etc. Our insurer is now treating it all as a continuous claim from 2008.
So basically THEY (the insurer's last builders) did this to us.
Fed up.