I don't see why Taken is making a fuss, especially as her figures concerning her own pension which form the basis of her argument appear to be flawed.
I think nurses do a great job and I think police officers do a great job. However the jobs are not the same and, therefore, cannot be compared. If you disagree with the terms and conditions in nursing, fight to change them - don't decide to do another profession down!
If you really want to get shirty about pensions in the public sector, get your teeth into this deal:
My husband is 38 and earns c £70k in the public sector. In two years he can retire with a pension of c £17k if he takes minimum commutation and a pension of £11k if he takes the maximum commutation of c £100k. His pension is completely non-contributary. That's a gold-plated pension!
Given that every silver lining has a cloud, the stinger is that he's a soldier, currently serving in Afghanistan. We get shifted from pillar to post frequently, endure long separations (I haven't seen him since the beginning of December although he is due home soon for some much-needed R&R), we've lived in accomodation that was definitely sub-par, he cannot strike, cannot join a poltical party, cannot join a professional body, is exempt from minimum working hours legislation, minimum pay legislation and has no legal right to paternity leave. I live with the very real possibility that my husband will not come home to me and our children or that he will suffer a life-changing injury.
Of course there are positives to his job or he wouldn't do it and we wouldn't support him but I use him to point out that you cannot look at a pension entitlement in isolation - you have to take into consideration all other aspects of the job.
Walk a mile in someone else's shoes before being so damned judgemental.