Personally I don't care whether people are pro or anti-abortion, or somewhere in the middle. I just wanted to clear up a few things.
I have spent many years of my career working in paediatric pathology. I have seen and examined thousands of "products of conception" (first trimester losses), and have seen (but not examined) thousands of "social terminations" (abortions.) I have also been involved with assisting with later losses.
IMHO, there is a clear difference between a first trimester pregnancy and a second trimester pregnancy. A first trimester pregnancy simply has the possibilty of creating a fetus. A surprisingly large number will never be viable. In the first trimester you honestly do just have a "bundle of cells". The rate of first trimester losses is surprisingly high (sorry, do not have figures on me), and of these I would estimate that 95% show no evidence of a fetus. They are merely placenta and decidua and were never going to progress to a baby.
Once you get past approx. 15 weeks, and have had scans showing healthy growth and fetal heartbeat then yes, in the majority of cases that will lead to a baby.
And yes, at 22 weeks, within the termination limit, a fetus does look more-or-less like an actual baby. They obviously don't look quite "right" as there is lots of development still to be done. TBH the majority of terminations at this time are medical terminations, largely because the fetus would never survive.
As somebody above said, most abortions are in the first trimester. So realistically you are ending the possibility of a baby.
In essence, I just wanted to point out the huge swing and difference between first and second trimesters, and that's all I have to say on the matter.