We have 2 DC - 8 and 6. DH works f/t. I work p/t for 4.5 hours each weekday (normally within school hours, but my manager is usually receptive to requests to change this).
We have the usual working parent problem of covering school holidays (and have no family help). This year, after juggling and "child swapping" with other parents, we are short of 3 weeks cover for the summer (may be able to child-swap odd extra day). In the past we've covered this by using a local holiday club, however last year DS complained that the club was a bit babyish (although the club takes children up to age 12, in practice they are mainly younger children). Our only other local holiday clubs are all sports based and neither DC is sporty.
DH has suggested for the problem 3 week period, he will work at home, I will go into work early and be home by 1.30 at the latest. The idea would be that the DC can amuse themselves in the morning, then they can have lunch with him, then I will be home and can do "stuff" with them in the afternoon/evening. There are no issues with DH working at home as all of his colleagues work remotely from him and don't care whether he is in the office or anywhere else. However I'm still wondering if this arrangement is really fair to everyone. Would we be unreasonable to adopt this childcare solution?