Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think that the school system is vastly overcomplicated

52 replies

diminishedresponsibility · 24/02/2012 21:43

I started learning how it all works about 2 years ago when my ds turned 1.
I still don't fully understand it.
KS1, KS2, levels, SATs, Primary Framework, PSHE, CIT and FFS why can't school years be named their age i.e when a child is 4-5 etc.
It just seems to get more complicated the more I get into it.

OP posts:
TroublesomeEx · 28/02/2012 13:06

Pendeen Yes, it's easy to understand in that it's not nuclear physics, but what would most parents do with the knowledge? It doesn't help parents give children a head start. It's a planning tool. As is the PF.

So for example this is from KS1 History.

Knowledge, skills and understanding

Chronological understanding

  1. Pupils should be taught to:
a. place events and objects in chronological order b. use common words and phrases relating to the passing of time (for example, before, after, a long time ago, past).

Knowledge and understanding of events, people and changes in the past

  1. Pupils should be taught to:
a. recognise why people did things, why events happened and what happened as a result b. identify differences between ways of life at different times.

Historical interpretation

  1. Pupils should be taught to identify different ways in which the past is represented.

Historical enquiry

  1. Pupils should be taught:
a. how to find out about the past from a range of sources of information (for example, stories, eye-witness accounts, pictures and photographs, artefacts, historic buildings and visits to museums, galleries and sites, the use of ICT-based sources) b. to ask and answer questions about the past.

Teachers use this to make sure that across a half term planning the children have the opportunity to learn, practice and apply these skills but what, as a parent, does it actually tell you?

Within our own families we do discuss these sorts of things anyway when talking about the way TV used to be, what toys we played with, visiting castles and stately homes, looking at different hair/clothes etc in photographs, looking at how we have changed, discussing how our children have changed and will continue to do so... We don't need the NC to tell us to have these conversations with our children. They're just natural.

A lot of parents want to know what they can teach their children before starting school, to give them a bit of a head start. Having access to the NC won't really help with that and whilst parents can give their children a good foundation by providing interesting experiences and opportunities, etc. understanding how the education system works or what the NC/PF says about something, how many weeks should be spent on a certain topic and in which order they should be approached (which is what the PF does) won't really help.

diminishedresponsibility · 28/02/2012 21:59

yes you're right, and that's a well written post. I think my 'problem' is not that I feel I should have a good understanding of these things but that I should be 'armed' with this information. Now what's made me like that? What's made me think that I have to challenge myself to learn as much as I can for the benefit of my child's future. What is it that I am interpreting to either rightly or wrongly come to the conclusion that my child's education relies on my intervention in some way.
Maybe that's another topic, but maybe I should just rest assured that it'll all be ok regardless - yeah right!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page