Sorry repost:
Okay this from NUT website:"Hutton Report on Public Sector Pensions - press release
Commenting ahead of Lord Hutton?s report on public sector pensions, Christine Blower, General Secretary of the National Union of Teachers, the largest teachers? union said;
?Lord Hutton in his first report last October recognised that public sector pensions are far from ?gold plated? and that the changes already made in 2007 are cutting their costs. Despite this, he appears to have swallowed the lie that public sector pensions are still unaffordable."
?The National Audit Office has confirmed that public sector pension costs are falling as expected due to the reforms already in place. Teachers are already paying more, the normal pension age has been raised to 65 for new entrants and employer contributions have been capped."
More recent info from NUT website:
"Lord Hutton?s final report on 10 March has set out various options for change ? all will cut our pensions."
Sounds like he wanted change.
Sorry, this does not say it is sustainable, merely costs are falling.Please point out where it claims to be sustainable long term. Oh and in 2007 this allows for employer 14% contribution compared to employee 6.4% (have heard 6.8% quoted previously but 6.4% is from an NUT website presentation). This would be rarely (if ever) the case in the private sector.