Mayorquimby
I can mate, because the journalists watched a video without actually looking at what's happening inside the octagon, there was no striking at all
Think about it, if journalists had done some basic research on the match, they wouldnt have labelled it a kids exhibition grappling match at an adult mma event, but instead they made it "kids cage fighting" and clearly we both know that people wont do their own research to see if journalists actually know what they're on about with th story, journalists can get away with a lack of research nowadays, despite google being alble to correct any flaws quickly
Kids show martial arts discipline in exhibition at MMA event. Vs Cage fighting kids
Now which is true ? And which will make headlines ? Lazy journalismi
Even the BMA got involved, and their opinion on mma is full of flawed arguments, in this case, they tol saw this as cage fighting and suggested they do judo instead! It is judo, minus the gi ..
Had the journalists correctly identified the sport, any parent with a sense of martial arts would have supported the actual sport (perhaps not the environment though)
It would be like calling the australian football league, soccer because its on a field and you kick the ball, and accepting because its got a ball and you're on a field the journalists are write
I hope people now realize grappling is a safe martial art, and that the mma cage is for safety
UK brands that get airtime, UCMMA & BAMMA, are cheap and tasteless show, UK brands like ommac and cage warriors are still underground but focus on martial arts more than the old school theme
The UfC built on a barbaric cockfighting image has transformed the sport massively
RubberDuck I dont think a childs exhibition match should have been at a cheap adult mma event