DarlingDuck, you may like to have a look at Deed Not Breed too.
I'll give you an example of how bloody silly the idea of a "bad" or "dangerous" breed is....
Take a look at our friends across the water, the Irish. Not a population which is too far removed from the English, either by distance or by culture. One which has a fair amount of communication going on with our own country, at central and local government level and between organisations like the Dogs Trust, which has Irish branches, and the SPCA and our RSPCA.
I own German Shepherds (and a Lab, but that's beside the point atm!). Here in England I may walk my Sheps offlead and unmuzzled in public, as may my 14 yo DD2. If I lived in Ireland I'd have to have them on a lead of no more than 3 foot, keep them muzzled in public and my 14 yo would be 2 years too young to legally take them out in public at all.
Yet if I lived in Ireland I could own a Pit Bull, albeit under the same conditions as owning a GSD.
Plenty of those I associate with in Irish rescue do. With their children. Happily and uneventfully.
So you tell me, what's the difference between our countries which is so great as to necessitate such huge differences in law? Are the Irish so different to us? Are their dogs?
Of course not! Why, if the DDA on banned breeds is such a good, workable, reasonable and effective law, have the Irish not adopted it? Why, if their laws on GSDs are so excellent, have we not taken their lead (excuse the pun)?
If these dogs were really so dangerous purely by virtue of their breed and not the actions which some commit, wouldn't all Europe, if not all the Western world, be acting in unison?