oh, and perhaps when feckless men stop walking away from their families never to be seen again, and when couples do split the feckless men don't do everything in their power to never pay for their children again, or think 50% of raising a child is £5 a week and begrudge even that, then perhaps women who have suffered because of those men wouldn't feel so much anger, eh?
I assume that you see your children loads and that you pay 50% of raising each of your children. That's 50% of everything they need - roof over their head, food, clothes, trips, holidays, etc. Good. At least you don't think that £5 or £10 or £20 a week is a reasonable contribution to your children.
But until feckless men realise that splitting from their partner does not mean walking away from the children, does not mean that the children can live on fresh air, and realise that their financial obligations are hundreds each month, not tens, then things will not change. Women are angry because these men have behaved disgustingly. You think that a woman would be angry in the event of a nice, amicable split where the man didn't abandon his children, quit his job so he didn't have to pay for them? refuse to see them? let them down? chuck the odd tenner at her and think that made him a star? Really?
[disclaimed - not all men. many men are great and don't walk away from their children. I am talking about the feckless variety]
Oh. and I am married. for 13 years. to the father of my children. before you make assumptions.