Threads

See more results

Topics

Usernames

Mumsnet Logo
Please
or
to access all these features

To think that giving up smoking can actually CAUSE cancer

118 replies

merrywidow · 27/03/2011 20:11

Have seen several people give up smoking then develop lung / throat cancer.

spoke to a friend, she says the same of someone she knows.

A cell biologist I met actually asked if my H who died of lung cancer had given up smoking, I said he had a couple of years previously, then nodded sagely.

I googled the subject and found a docs forum where they actually discussed it; the thought was that as the body heals the cells then don't know when to stop dividing and go into overdrive becoming cancerous.

OP posts:
Report
Please
or
to access all these features

Violethill · 27/03/2011 20:31

Surely a more accurate thread title would be:

"AIBU to think that smoking is the major cause of lung, throat and mouth cancer, whether this presents itself while the sufferer is still smoking or after they have ceased?"

In which case the response should be a resounding YANBU

Please
or
to access all these features

doutzen · 27/03/2011 20:32

Yes, I think that it can too.
The only people I know/or of that have had lung cancer are the ones that gave up smoking.

Please
or
to access all these features

CatIsSleepy · 27/03/2011 20:35

allen carr smoked about 60 fags a day or something ridiculous like that

statistically there will be a proportion of ex-smokers who will die of lung cancer, it can't all be people who are still puffing away

having smoked at all is bad for you

Please
or
to access all these features

southeastastra · 27/03/2011 20:35

allen carr spent years in rooms with people chain-smoking to help them give up

i truely think this sort of misinformation can cause harm to people looking for an excuse to carry on smoking

see if i'm still here in a couple of years too Grin i smoked alot

Please
or
to access all these features

BakeliteBelle · 27/03/2011 20:37

When I was a nurse, there were a couple of patients who gave up long-term smoking habits and then went on to have strokes shortly afterwards.

They said they were finally able to give up because they were beginning to feel really unwell before the strokes occurred and they no longer wanted to smoke.

Perhaps this connection is more to do with the body telling the person they have cancer, before the doctors diagnose it. They give up smoking, get diagnosed with cancer and everyone concludes that giving up smoking gave them cancer....

Please
or
to access all these features

CatIsSleepy · 27/03/2011 20:42

hmm
so what some people are saying is that if everyone smoked and no-one gave up, no-one would get lung cancer??? because that is bloody ridiculous

the stats on lung cancer reflect the number of people that smoke

stopping smoking has been shown to reduce your risk of cancer

believing otherwise is sticking your head in the sand

Please
or
to access all these features

NibletMewling · 27/03/2011 20:42

The media reported the results of a preliminary study earlier this month which suggested that the desire to stop smoking (or the absence of the desire to continue to smoke) after a lifelong habit might actually imply that you have cancer.

See here: www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/07/AR2011030703659.html

Apparently many lung cancer patients spontaneously stop smoking months before they are diagnosed, and before symptoms appear. It could explain the anecdotal evidence of people here, tho obviously it is only a small study. But if true, the giving up isn't the cause of the cancer, but the symptom.

Please
or
to access all these features

SardineQueen · 27/03/2011 20:44

It's an interesting theory. I wonder if you are quite old and a heavy long term smoker, the shock to the system of stopping might bring something on. It's not beyond the realms of possibility.

I think allen carr was on 100 a day. Such a shame, a great man IMO, has helped so many people. He reckoned that quitting gave him more time as if he'd kept on the way he was going he'd be dead in no time. That's what his book says anyway.

Please
or
to access all these features

SardineQueen · 27/03/2011 20:45

Niblet that's very interesting too.

Stuff like this is fascinating isn;t it.

Please
or
to access all these features

popstar · 27/03/2011 20:48

I agree with BakeliteBelle's and Nibletet's thinking. And I'm a doctor.
Good luck to anyone trying to give up. Biggest favour you can do yourself.

Please
or
to access all these features

onagar · 27/03/2011 20:49

Please
or
to access all these features

StealthPolarBear · 27/03/2011 20:50

gordy well done :o
Freaky "giving up" cancers discounted (as I'm sure they can be) I bet you are twice as healthy now as you were a year ago

Mamaz0n, so so sorry to hear that :(

Don;t let this put anyone off giving up - the NHS can provide free support, in fact they are falling over themselves to support you because quitting smoking saves lives and makes those lives healthier!

Please
or
to access all these features

StealthPolarBear · 27/03/2011 20:51

Wow that's interesting Niblet (ust read that post), almost like the opposite of pica in pregnancy

Please
or
to access all these features

iPhoneDrone · 27/03/2011 20:51

I've no idea if there is a link or not, but nearly all the people I know who have given up smoking have then spent the next year or so with hacking coughs, mouth ulcers (seems to be really common), colds, general illness.

Any ideas why this is? and particularly the mouth ulcer thing?

Please
or
to access all these features

CatIsSleepy · 27/03/2011 20:52

onagar i was extrapolating from the idea that giving up smoking is what causes cancer, as that seemed to be the idea being bandied around by some

and yes, that is ridiculous

smoking causes cancer, not giving up

Please
or
to access all these features

CMOTdibbler · 27/03/2011 20:52

And I bet you that a lot of people give up smoking because they have a cough/persistent sore throat which they then see the Dr about later - and it was cancer all along.

Cancer is caused by a series of changes in cell DNA, and its hugely unlikely that stopping pumping chemicals into ones body would cause that sequence of events to occur

Please
or
to access all these features

RumourOfAHurricane · 27/03/2011 20:52

Message withdrawn

Please
or
to access all these features

southeastastra · 27/03/2011 20:54

well people are 'mugs' to do alot of what they do.

price of cigarettes now is ridiculous

good reason to stop if any more is needed!

Please
or
to access all these features

JarethTheGoblinKing · 27/03/2011 20:55

I shall ask someone who actually knows, and report back.

Please
or
to access all these features

RumourOfAHurricane · 27/03/2011 20:55

Message withdrawn

Please
or
to access all these features

cumfy · 27/03/2011 20:56

YABU

I believe there are plenty of studies which look at the long term effects of giving up.

The big picture is that giving up by 40-50, gives only about 1 year less life expectancy than a lifelong non-smoker.
Continue smoking and it's 10 years less.

If large numbers of people started dying when they gave up, it would turn up in statistics.

Please
or
to access all these features

southeastastra · 27/03/2011 20:56

oh thanks for that patrionising post

Please
or
to access all these features

MrsTittleMouse · 27/03/2011 20:57

I read ages ago (just over 10 years) that if you gave up smoking before you were 30ish that you would have no more risk of cancer than a non-smoker (once several years had passed). I remember showing it to a work collegue who was in his early thirties and trying to give up. It was an article in New Scientist, so from proper scientific research (I should hope!).

I find bakelite and niblet's theory interesting.

Please
or
to access all these features

SardineQueen · 27/03/2011 20:58

iphone the cough is down to the little hairs down your throat starting to work again and your lungs trying to get rid of all the crap.

Giving up anything you are addicted to seems to mean going through a spell of crapness - drinking, smoking, harder drugs - I think that while the body works to get to grips with not having something it has had for all that time and sort of rebalancing it can make people more succeptible to infections and things.

I guess that's the "dangerous" bit - you give up something and instead of feeling better, for a while you often feel much worse!!!

Please
or
to access all these features

RumourOfAHurricane · 27/03/2011 20:58

Message withdrawn

Please
or
to access all these features
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

We're all short on time

Log in or sign up to use the 'See Next' or 'See all' posts by the OP (Original Poster) and cut straight to the action.

Already signed up?

Sign up to continue reading

Mumsnet's better when you're logged in. You can customise your experience and access way more features like messaging, watch and hide threads, voting and much more.

Already signed up?