Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think breast fed babies are more intellegent

1002 replies

thecatamongthepidgeons · 13/03/2011 19:52

Because their parents tend to be more intellegent not because they were breast fed?
More intellegent parents are more likely to choose to breast feed regardless of any dificulties they face if they think it will benefit their children.

OP posts:
Spudulika · 14/03/2011 10:55

"I agree with you that the OP is making a wrongful assumption that intelligent mothers will breastfeed against the odds"

But length of breastfeeding does correlate strongly with social class and education.

The women who breastfeed longest tend to be the best educated.

Assuming that breastfeeding problems such as mastitis, issues surrounding supply, nipple trauma etc affect all women equally across social classes, it does seem that better educated women are less likely to stop breastfeeding because of any difficulties they might face.

Re: work issues, professional women are both the most likely to return to work, and also the most likely to breastfeed for 6 months +. Women who are least likely to breastfeed, or who who stop the earliest are also those who are least likely to ever have worked before having children.

We should be asking ourselves the question - why should education and social class in the UK have such a massive influence on women's decision to breastfeed and their likelyhood of success with it?

"the bf/socio-economic status thing is not universal but cultural". True!

Re: studies

This is a good place to track down research

here

rubberduckduck · 14/03/2011 11:04

just seen this

daily fail

Habbibu · 14/03/2011 11:08

lenack, I've spent a lot of time working in university research settings, so it's not blind faith. However, I think that what you're saying is much more nuanced, lenak, and I agree with the problems you've set out. My slightly ranty (sorry!) response to you was largely coloured by annoyance that people seem to think the most basic confounders aren't considers by professional researchers - you'd hope that peer review would have studies like that out on their ears, or even the grant application process.

Habbibu · 14/03/2011 11:08

Yuck, overuse and misspelling of name. Sorry!

Pagwatch · 14/03/2011 11:21

I bf all three of my children

2 are very intelligent. One has special needs.

My breasts clearly were not paying attention during much of 1996.

TheGashlycrumbTinies · 14/03/2011 11:23
Biscuit

It's my first, whoop whoop !

Spudulika · 14/03/2011 11:29

"I bf all three of my children

2 are very intelligent. One has special needs".

At the most bf adds a few IQ points. Parents wouldn't expect to be able to see the difference made by bf in individual children.

But you knew that didn't you?

Pagwatch · 14/03/2011 11:30

It was a joke.

Spudulika · 14/03/2011 11:37

Sorry Pagwatch. Blush

It's just there are so many other posts that say the same that aren't joking!

NinkyNonker · 14/03/2011 11:37

I was just about to add a Grin for your comment Pagwatch so don't despair!

lenak · 14/03/2011 11:41

We should be asking ourselves the question - why should education and social class in the UK have such a massive influence on women's decision to breastfeed and their likelyhood of success with it?

Because (and this is of course a huge generalisation) education women of middle or higher social class are much more likely to:

a) ask for help and be more assertive in asking for that help
b) be listened to by professionals
c) to have done more independent research i.e. books, internet and know what is available and therefore more likely to question attitudes that some professionals may have.
d) have peer support from friends relatives who have breastfed.

lenak · 14/03/2011 11:41

educated not education

BaggedandTagged · 14/03/2011 12:01

lenak I think d is critical. I live overseas, in HK where overall bf rates are pitifully low (due partly to cultural factors, partly due to v short mat leave provision and very cheap childcare).

However, amongst the western expat population, bf rates are extremely high- I would guess close to 80% bf at 6 mths. Why? Because immigration restrictions mean that the western expat population comprises almost entirely the subgroup in the UK who are most likely to bf and they hang around together- going to the expat meet ups etc.

This becomes self fulfilling because when you go to a baby group/ baby class, nearly everyone is bf, so it is easier for you to do it and you have friends with slightly older children who bf etc etc. and tell you where all the "bf friendly" places are, give you advice etc

jumpingbeans · 14/03/2011 12:07

I am surprised you were to bf what with yer head jammed so far up yer arse.

mippy · 14/03/2011 13:19

I was formula fed.

I had a secondary school reading age by the time I was three.

My mum just didn;t like the idea of bfing Smile

MaryThornbar · 14/03/2011 13:29

Spudulika But length of breastfeeding does correlate strongly with social class and education.

The women who breastfeed longest tend to be the best educated.

Assuming that breastfeeding problems such as mastitis, issues surrounding supply, nipple trauma etc affect all women equally across social classes, it does seem that better educated women are less likely to stop breastfeeding because of any difficulties they might face.

Really interesting - I stand corrected! I would fit to that demographic as I would be one of those people who did BF for over 6 months despite numerous problems, although I know I am in a minority amongst my equally intelligent friends. I think a lot of it is about the support you have access to too.

Honeybee79 · 14/03/2011 13:31
Biscuit

It's my first also!

PigeonMalteserMadness · 14/03/2011 13:32

I thought it was funny Pag, not about your gorgeous DS2 obviously, but breasts not paying attention in the second half of the nineties.

I wonder what they were up to?

StealthPolarBear · 14/03/2011 13:41

Habbibu, but have you considered that maybe the differences in outcomes are down to the differences in demographic of those who bf vs those who don't?

:o

KnittedBreast is right to a point - poverty leads to poor outcomes for children. That isn't really under debate.

Habbibu · 14/03/2011 13:44
Habbibu · 14/03/2011 13:46

yy, lenak - also d explains why the socio-economic status and bf correlation isn't global - normalisation across society = increased social support.

lololizzy · 14/03/2011 13:46

ho ho very 'intellegent' spelling there..deliberate?

DeepPurple · 14/03/2011 13:49

I was only BF until 6 weeks. Is that why I have 10 GCSEs, 4 A levels, a degree and a DIP RSA?

Maybe if I'd been BF longer I'd have a masters too Hmm

Oh and both my mum and dad don't have any educational qualifications. They weren't BF so they must be fick.

So how's that work then? Hmm

IAMGOINGTOBEGOOD · 14/03/2011 13:51

I think if people read the entire post they would see the OP was not putting down formula feeds but actually saying it made no difference to intelligence.
The few IQ points between results are hardly significant as tests taken at different times would also be differnt by a few points.
Personally I think it odd how those who CHOOSE to FF ignore results of studies if it suits their life style and get so defensive if they think they are being judged even if they are not.
Of course the Mums who can not BF should not be judged they are doing the best they can for their babies.

IAMGOINGTOBEGOOD · 14/03/2011 13:51

feeders

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread