Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to ask if you would use donated breastmilk if it was available rather than formula?

712 replies

bubbleymummy · 15/02/2011 11:32

Inspired by another thread.

I personally would rather use donated milk. If you wouldn't - why not?

OP posts:
fannyfoghorn · 15/02/2011 11:57

No I wouldn't except if I had a tiny baby in SCBU in which case I would be willing to risk it. I find the idea of putting an unknown human's bodily fluids in my baby totally repellent. Sorry - but you did ask!

bubbleymummy · 15/02/2011 11:57

karma, mistakes are made with formula as well. People not making up bottles correctly so not killing the bacteria in the powder and there have been quite a few contamination scares.

OP posts:
OnEdge · 15/02/2011 11:58

No because I read somewhere that the antibodies are only effective if the milk is from the baby's own mother. Aparently, that is why babies that were fed by a wet Nurse never seemed to benefit regarding health. I might consider it from a nutrient point of view though.

Cleofartra · 15/02/2011 11:58

"but accepting a product from someone else's body is a non life or death situation is totally another"

But cows milk is from a body!

bubbleymummy · 15/02/2011 11:58

fanny, but not an unknown cow's?

OP posts:
TheArmadillo · 15/02/2011 11:58

no I wouldn't

1)logistics
2) and more importantly I wouldn't trust the screening - what with all the problems there have been with infected blood. It's not a life or death choice there is a reasonable alternative (formula) so no.

tanmu82 · 15/02/2011 11:59

No I wouldn't....like others have said already there is a good enough substitute

ChickensHaveNoEyebrows · 15/02/2011 12:00

Powdered because it would last longer, and I'd be worried if I was using fresh BM that their could be a supply problem If they could powder it, you could build up a stock.

squeakytoy · 15/02/2011 12:00

No. Absolutely not.

ChickensHaveNoEyebrows · 15/02/2011 12:00

Oh, and powdered would probably make it cheaper. You could move more volume for less cost etc.

kreecherlivesupstairs · 15/02/2011 12:00

Probably not TBH.
I am curious about why bubbleymummy is interested. market research?

solooovely · 15/02/2011 12:01

No! Because of the risk of diseases being passed from the woman to my baby. I know they are screened but what about all the people who caught HIV from blood transfusions before we knew it exsisted. Or CJD which is hard to diagnose and is not screened for.

fedupofnamechanging · 15/02/2011 12:02

I trust myself to make up the bottles properly though, so I wouldn't worry about that.

bubbleymummy · 15/02/2011 12:02

kreecher - it was inspired by the aptimil containing fish thread. No market research! :)

OP posts:
bubbleymummy · 15/02/2011 12:04

well you can still get contaminated powder karma.

I wonder why people put so much faith in something manufactured by a company out to make money rather than a mother donating her own milk? Obviously it should be screened - and screening has certainly come a long way.

OP posts:
kreecherlivesupstairs · 15/02/2011 12:05

I see, I don't even know what Aptimil is Blush
I had horrible visions of you harnessing a load of lactating women in the third world and freeze drying their breast milk.
I think I saw a Simpsons episode where the children were served rats milk at school.

TanteRose · 15/02/2011 12:06

OMG, some of you do NOT want to know what diseases and bacteria can be involved with milking a cow.....that is why they have to disinfect the raw milk to within an inch of turning it to hot water....

Morloth · 15/02/2011 12:06

You know dairy never used to bother me, but since I have had DS2 in the UK with the whole BM/FT thing being such a big discussion. The more I think about it the more it creeps me out that we drink milk from cows.

It is weird, why do we do it? and why does eating a steak not have the yuck factor for me that drinking glass of milk does?

I am happy to eat other animals but not drink their milk.

ChickensHaveNoEyebrows · 15/02/2011 12:07

Can you imagine enough women 'donating' breast milk to supply all babies? I can't. They'd want paying. Which throws up lots of ethical issues.

bubbleymummy · 15/02/2011 12:07

Yuck! Funny how we find certain animal's milk ok and other animal's milk (and even human milk sometimes!) yucky! If we could all go out and buy bottles of breastmilk in the shop we probably wouldn't think anything of it. :)

OP posts:
JeremyVile · 15/02/2011 12:08

Also, once we start going down the route of turning BMinto a commodity, once money came into it (as it inevitably would) and it was just a nother product then it would end up being so far removed from BM as we see it now that I hardly think it would be worth it.
Once all the screening is done, the pasteurisation (assume that would eb necessary) all the processes to prolong its shelf life etc...
No, BM is a great thing - commercialising it would tuen it into something else altogether.

And, as someone else said, isn't what makes BM so great that it is naturally teilored to the 'intended' baby?

bubbleymummy · 15/02/2011 12:08

animals'

OP posts:
TanteRose · 15/02/2011 12:08

Never Google Cows and Mastitis....ewwww Shock

Morloth · 15/02/2011 12:09

I would be wary of purchased human milk but not donated. There is nothing in it for a BM door other than a 'feel good' factor. Throw money into the equation and you are going to get junkies etc donating for money.

Morloth · 15/02/2011 12:10

Donor not Door obviously.

doors don't lactate.