Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To tell you to spit out your tea?

77 replies

theevildead2 · 18/11/2010 18:45

^Received this email today from PETA.co.uk
Really disgusted and I will be boycotting these brands^.

Are you drinking tea right now? If so, I hope it's not a cup of PG tips, Lyons or Lipton tea ? those brands might leave a nasty taste in your mouth by the time you've finished reading this e-mail.

The multimillion-pound company behind PG tips, Lyons and Lipton teas has caused animals to suffer and die so that the company can make health claims about its teas. By supporting PETA's vital work, you can help us put an end to cruel experiments on animals and make a difference in the lives of countless other animals in need. Please make a donation today.

PETA has uncovered numerous cruel tests that the maker of PG Tips, Lyons and Lipton has conducted on animals to evaluate the effects of tea. The following are just a few examples:

  ? Rabbits were fed a high-fat diet, giving them abnormally high cholesterol levels and hardened arteries and then fed tea in their water. After the experiment, the rabbits' heads were cut off.

  ? Mutant Mice bred to suffer bowel inflammation were administered tea ingredients in order to see if there were any effects on their condition. After the test, the mice were killed by neck-breaking or suffocation.

  ? Rats were forced to eat a high-fructose diet, damaging their brains. Others had their abdominal wall punctured and were fed radioactively labelled tea ingredients through a tube in their stomach. All the animals were later killed.

  ? Piglets were exposed to E coli toxins which cause diarrhoea. As part of the tests, experimenters cut the pigs' intestines apart while the animals were still alive. The pigs were then killed. 

Experimenting on animals is not only cruel but also unnecessary. There are cheaper, quicker and more accurate methods available. Yet every three seconds, an animal dies in a European lab.

Typhoo, Twinings, Tesco and Fortnum & Mason have given PETA written confirmation that they don't test their teas on animals ? but the maker of PG tips refuses to end its torment of animals.

Vivisection is a sickening example of exploitation on a massive scale. In 2009, more than 3.5 million individual animals were experimented on in the UK. All but a tiny few are now dead.

Animals in laboratories around the world are abused in horrific ways. Poisoned. Starved. Brain-damaged. Paralysed. Mutilated. Irradiated. Burned. Gassed. Electrocuted. Kittens are deliberately blinded. Mice are made to grow tumours as big as their own bodies. Monkeys have holes drilled into their heads. Sheep and pigs have their skin burned off.

Abuse of animals for tea must stop. You can help by making a donation to support PETA today.

With your support, we can save the lives of millions of individual animals by working to change the way chemicals, drugs and products such as food, beverages and the ingredients that go into them are tested here and across the European Union ? as well as by fighting to improve the treatment of animals all around the world.

PETA and our affiliates are the greatest ? and often the only ? hope for animals facing the horrors of vivisection. We are making progress, but we won't rest until tests on animals are abandoned for good. We know that we can achieve this by using hugely effective and proven campaigning techniques such as the following:

  ? Pressuring companies to ban animal testing: this has been successfully done with more than 1,000 businesses.

  ? Publicising evidence from undercover investigations: the video footage from a recent PETA US investigation of a vivisection laboratory was so powerful that it led to the closing of the laboratory within a week of broadcast of the footage.

  ? Lobbying decision-makers at national and EU levels to stop animal testing: following pressure from PETA, European regulators recently issued new industry guidelines outlining how thousands of companies can avoid animal tests.

  ? Funding research of non-animal test methods: funding allowed for the scientific evaluation of a cruelty-free skin irritation test, which has replaced painful tests that were previously conducted on rabbits.

  ? Educating the public: the horrifying facts about vivisection need to be clearly communicated to the media and the public alike. 

Our success depends on you. The animals who are suffering behind the closed doors of laboratories cannot help themselves. They need us ? and so do countless other animals facing abuse right now. We must do everything in our power to save them. Please donate today.

Very truly yours,

Ingrid E. Newkirk
Founder

PS I know that I will never drink teas from PG tips, Lipton or Lyons until the company behind them drops these deadly tests forever, and I hope that you will join me. PETA has a proven track record of helping animals and can save many more lives with your help today. Thank you for your continued support. It's vital to our success.

OP posts:
theevildead2 · 18/11/2010 19:37

I take your Biscuit and raise you a pomBear

OP posts:
BusyMissIzzy · 18/11/2010 21:09

"There are cheaper, quicker and more accurate methods available"

Having worked in scientific research for quite a few years, I can say that any experiments involving animals are highly regulated and laboratories have to demonstrate that there is no alternative method before being given the go-ahead by the Home Office to perform the experiment.

LadyViper · 18/11/2010 21:32

If they were quicker, cheaper and more accurate I can assure you they would be used.

Noone tests on animals for fun!

LadyViper · 18/11/2010 21:33

I too used to work in research and you have no idea how many ethics workshops I have been on!

Vallhala · 18/11/2010 22:27

I try to keep abreast of news of this sort but the tea info is something I was unaware of.

I rarely buy the brands mentioned anyway but I'm buggered if I EVER will again.

Well done you for raising the matter Evil.

scurryfunge · 18/11/2010 22:34

unilever brands to boycott

Thingumy · 18/11/2010 22:45

I didn't start this thread Scurry.

I posted a thread in chat as I was shocked to hear that animals were used in Tea testing.

Simple as that really.

scurryfunge · 18/11/2010 22:48

I know, sorry, I got a bit confused Blush

Thingumy · 18/11/2010 22:49

No problem Wink

Mimile · 18/11/2010 22:57

I was going to speak about the home office etc, but eh, other have done so before

there: Biscuit

Fluteyboots · 18/11/2010 23:02

What a ridiculous post, inflammatory rubbish. Strict regulations exist to prevent non-essential animal testing. And essential usually means it is required by law. And nobody would do it willy nilly even if they could, it costs a fortune.Enjoying a cup of PG right now with a Biscuit

Thingumy · 18/11/2010 23:10

Why can other tea companies produce tea with the need to use animal testing then?

scurryfunge · 18/11/2010 23:13

It may not be produced in Britain where it would be unlawful not to test.

tethersend · 18/11/2010 23:15
scurryfunge · 18/11/2010 23:17

I know Tethersend, I mentioned the theme of this thread to my DS who promptly said, "everyone knows chimps like tea"

UltimatePomBear · 18/11/2010 23:18

Time for my first properly used Bear
(nb my pom bear is 100% cruelty free)

tethersend · 18/11/2010 23:22

It's like the elephant in a wig the room, isn't it scurry?

theevildead2 · 19/11/2010 07:50

According to the email if you read it.... The testing is done so they can make claims about health benifits of tea. Which is why other tea manufacturers of tea don't need to do the tests.

OP posts:
Morloth · 19/11/2010 08:32

PETS have a proven track record of being a bunch of fucking nutters who get off on cruelty to animals so that they can jump up and down and shout 'LOOK AT ME!' IMO.

Rollmops · 19/11/2010 08:56

PETA is the pits.
It's the very organisation that makes me want to dig out the mink coats my Grandmother left me and prance around the house in them.
Too much of a chicken to wear them out, however, around here people would only compliment on the depth colour without trying to add some from spray can.Hmm
Extremists of any sort do get the opposite reaction to what is desired, so often indeed.

coraltoes · 19/11/2010 10:31

Regardless of whether there is truth in the statement or not, the OP has taken it at face value and chosen to provide us with the opinion of Peta to aide our informed buying decisions. It is hardly a crime to do so.

I drink teapigs tea. Wonderful stuff. I will now read more into what testing might go on with the more mainstream brands and avoid every using those that DO revert to cruelty where other brands do not. Where is the harm in learning a bit more and avoiding such brands?

Finally, for the person who mentioned Body Shop/ L'Oreal just because it has been bought by them, doesn't mean it has started testing on animals. It was a commercial transaction, not a change in ethics.

theevildead2 · 19/11/2010 10:56

who get off on cruelty to animals

Do they? mmmmm I didn't when I worked there.... and didn't meet anyone who did either. Thats like saying the NSPCC get off on pedophilia and child abuse.

Thank you Coraltoes, I didn't see why I needed a box of bicuits either just for reprinting something.

OP posts:
switchtvoffdosomelessboring · 19/11/2010 11:01

Inflammatory rubbish!

I particularly like the way 'the mutant mice are killed by neck breaking after the test.'

Neck breaking is the quickest and most humane way of killing rodents.

Animal experiments are not done willy nilly. The cost A LOT of money and are only done if there is no alternative. All this bullshit that there is a wealth of alternatives scientists don't use because they secretly enjoy torturing animals is frankly an insult.

I have been at numerous animal facilities and have never, in any occasion seen the animals treated with anything other than respect. Posting this sort of nonsense doesn't make the general public want to stop animal testing, it just makes most people think that PETA and the like are a bunch of nutters.

Malificence · 19/11/2010 11:02

Peta are lunatics - they want animal ownership banned and would euthanise all pets. Nice eh?

I drink Punjana tea btw.

WhyHavePets · 19/11/2010 11:06

The fact is that the language is terrible, inflammitory and not necessary. yes it is surprising that they are using animals for tea testing and I am sure a lot of people would be against that if it was presented in a reasonable way but all this "rabbits had their heads cut off" stuff just makes them look like loons who will dress things up to fit their cause - thereby losing them the support they could have had.

I would quite happily support a campaign to write to tea companies and tell them that we do not want ot know the health benefits of tea if they need to use animals to prove it but I will not be part of a petty attempt to stir up hatred and vitriol. I am an adult, I can decide what is important to me without all the emotive crap.

Swipe left for the next trending thread