Very controversial view point i know but imo adopters should be properly trained and not just given kids and left to it - and there should be a stay at home parent, so no relying on childcare. And that should be funded in some way. Atm adoption allowances are only available where children are really hard to place and are usually means tested. They should be standard.
At the end of the day, you can put loads of money and services in and it still won't work. I do think there needs to be an ehc plan, dla, paediatrician on tap, therapist.
But I used to be an AUK local coordinator and over about 15 years I saw so many prospective adopters go on to adopt. And nearly everyone disappeared after the adoption order. Then we would hear back from some of them when the problems really kicked in from about year 7 onwards.
The fact is, as long as there are still new adopters coming forward, there is no reason for Gov to act. The fact that applications are down is probably the best chance of getting anything done. Btw I thought surrogacy was largely behind the drop in adoption.