@ Syd35 ... Here in England, and I think it will probably be the same in Scotland, the social workers generally stop contact between a parent, normally a single mother, and his or her child, when they get a placement (for adoption) order, which seems to be called a permanence order in Scotland. It was easy for me to look the stuff up, because I already knew where it was. The "MJ (Mother)" case, aka "Re B" I think in a published law report, is the only one I am aware of where a placement order has been set aside on appeal. That was because the Adoption Panel which recommended the child for adoption, ie effectively gave the Local Authority permission to apply for a placement order, hadn't been shown all of the medical reports. Lord Justice Wall, who is now President of the Family Division, said that was a serious "procedural irregularity" and as a result the question of whether or not the child should be recommended for adoption had to be referred back to the Adoption Panel for reconsideration. It seems the only chance of getting a placement order set aside, aka revoked, ie cancelled, on appeal is if a sufficiently serious procedural irregularity can be identified in the prior proceedings. I think it will be a lot easier to do the above before the child has been physically placed in the home of the prospective adopters than it would be after that happens. How long that takes to happen will depend on whether or not the Local Authority have any prospective adopters lined up and waiting, so to speak.
A free-standing HRA 1998 claim, or a tort (wrongful acts) claim, is something entirely different to appealing agaisnt the issuing of a court order, even though the objective may well be the same, ie getting the order set aside and replaced by a different order.
A potential major problem with appealing is that if all of the boxes have been ticked, according to what is specified in the relevant Act, there generally isn't anything an appeal judge can do. He or she may not have made the same decision but can't set the order aside because it was "within the discretion" of the "judge below" to issue the order.
For anyone contemplating trying the HR claim or tort claim route, which I haven't actually tried myself but believe to be entirely possible, I think it would definitely be best to write the claim in terms of what is best for the child, ie to argue that the judge who issued the order complained of was wrong to do so because the evidence, that the parent is likely to harm the child in the future, is not in fact strong enough to deprive the child of his or her Article 8 right to respect for his or her private and family life. I think it may be more or less essential for the parent to obtain a recommendation from a medic to that effect. If not available from already known medics then maybe from another one, maybe or if necessary in a NHS Trust adjacent to the one the parent lives in.