I was 42 when DD was born, and aged 52 I think I’m done on the menstruation rollercoaster - my last period was April, although I know it needs to be a calendar year before you’re medically considered menopause.
Perimenopause wasn’t stress-free for me, but it seems to have been very easy by comparison with those of my friends.
Some months I experienced horrible menstrual flooding, and for a while I had irregular start-stop light periods that went on for two or three weeks at a time. Shudder. Also bouts of insomnia and low mood (perhaps linked) which was the worst, because I have always been a sound sleeper and blessed to have a cheery disposition. A very few hot flushes, which were peculiar rather than arresting as they have been for some of my friends.
I haven’t needed HRT or any other medication, nor any interventions beyond doubling up with period pants as well as a tampon.
I’ve just been discussing this with a group of friends, and the only one who has had a similarly gentle menopause also had her last one late, at 44.
I’m now pondering whether having children late in life offers some sort of protective hormonal benefit that makes the menopause more bearable.
As an amateur historian, I know that women often had live births into their late thirties and beyond in the years before contraception and family planning. Were women similarly afflicted by the menopause then, and silenced because of taboos; or was it just easier to endure physically, because they had never been on the Pill, and continued to have pregnancies right up until they were no longer fertile?