Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Will you sign up to the new refugee sponsorship scheme?

645 replies

JoyousOpalLemur · 27/06/2026 07:51

The Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is apparently announcing next week a new refugee sponsorship scheme.

It would allow households to privately sponsor refugees from conflict zones.

Applications open this autumn, with the aim of resettling more than 10,000 people.

It’s modelled on Canada’s scheme and the Homes for Ukraine programme.

Sponsors would commit to providing financial, emotional and practical support.

What do people think? I just can't help thinking that with the current pressures on housing, schools, GPs and local services, how this will actually work in practice? Has anyone been involved in the Ukraine sponsorship scheme and can share what it was really like day-to-day?

Curious to hear everyone’s views.

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/home-secretary-announce-scheme-refugees-uk-lgdr8ff25

Ukrainian-style scheme to bring thousands of refugees to the UK

Shabana Mahmood will introduce a new sponsorship scheme offering safe and legal routes for migrants in an effort to deter small boat arrivals

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/home-secretary-announce-scheme-refugees-uk-lgdr8ff25

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Lollygaggle · 27/06/2026 19:27

We hosted a Ukrainian family , whilst both working.

The problem being both they and ourselves thought it would be an arrangement that would last only a few months as the war would be over!

The level of support required both emotionally and practically was massive . Mum was depressed after leaving grown up children in Ukraine and basically was invested in Ukraine with no intention of integrating into U.K. society.

we had to navigate the benefits, visa, educational , health system for them . Mum was very passive and expected everything done for her. Would not engage in English lessons or even children’s education . The extensive use of phone translation meant even after 18 months neither mums nor children’s English had improved.

There was expectation raised by Ukrainian community that council houses etc would be provided , despite us saying that they were not a priority unless made homeless by us and as mum refused to work their benefits would not be enough to pay rent.

The rampant corruption in Ukrainian culture meant there was a deep distrust of all government including health. They were vaccine refusers and came with forged covid vaccine certificates. Mum was refusing routine vaccines for children such as MMR.

The expectation was we would help with children’s homework etc and even though we enrolled children in extracurricular activities we ended up taking and picking up and now family has moved out children have stopped these activities.

Many helped in our area and there were mixed experiences , some good , some bad . The essential problem is that many of the families had not made the mental leap to regarding the U.K. as a long term place to live and so were not motivated to engage and integrate. The family who hosted who struggled most had a family that included a child who was quite profoundly autistic and mum was absolutely at end of tether.

comparing with the large influx of Hong Kong , Iraqi, Afghani families who had no families to help them negotiate benefits, training , work , housing the Ukrainian families had far better support and I do not know how many in those other communities cope.

My family moved out to stay with another host and are still there. I was exhausted from working , supporting them , raising their children and dealing with the cultural differences of people living in your house (children not having fixed bedtimes so up all night , large amounts of food in fridge , freezer , cupboards so no room for ours , sweets/biscuits/cake given freely including in bedrooms , mum staying in bedroom all day chatting on phone whilst we were working , heating on full chat with windows open as in Ukrainian heating in flats etc is centrally controlled and not expensive etc).

We have hosted and supported refugees from other areas and for shorter times. I have also worked in refugee camps and have seen the appalling conditions people are expected to live in. I have also helped at a local refugee hotel where many families with children are dumped with nothing to do and no end in sight.

Would I do it again ? Possibly for a fixed term and with far more ground rules I didn’t know we needed. In the end Ukraine is bleeding , fighting a war so we don’t have to and as the mother of children who are draft age that I am thankful for.

However I think many who hosted were unprepared for the amount of time and energy that these families required in support both practical and emotional , and were unprepared for not just cultural clashes but the strains of living with families who have been traumatised and are not coping well with it. The main problem was there was no end in sight and with rent being so expensive many Ukrainians could not afford to have their own place without a good paying job.

JazzyJelly · 27/06/2026 19:27

I might consider a woman and/or children. But I think we should as a country give priority to women and children. I think, for instance, any female person with a Afghan passport should be given asylum.

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 19:29

Oftenaddled · 27/06/2026 14:59

Schemes for the international cooperation needed to stop the boats require Britain to take refugees

The rest of the world is not going to invest time, money and energy in making Britain a unique refugee free zone. Why would they?

You can bemoan that problem or try to do something about it. This scheme is the sort of measure you need to do something about it.

You can incentivise young men to take small boats, house them together unintegrated, leave them in limbo unable to work for years, or look for solutions to an international problem, cooperating with other international powers. And if there are people and institutions willing to help refugees, who in the right circumstances can contribute to our society, harnessing their voluntary efforts is very sensible.

There is a system to stop them coming. Third country processing. If you come you will go to Rwanda. The only people that will then come are those that prefer Rwanda to France. Worked for Australia.

Fluffypuppy1 · 27/06/2026 19:35

JazzyJelly · 27/06/2026 19:27

I might consider a woman and/or children. But I think we should as a country give priority to women and children. I think, for instance, any female person with a Afghan passport should be given asylum.

You do realise there are 25 million women in Afghanistan?

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 19:38

Oftenaddled · 27/06/2026 15:11

0.5% of the world's displaced people are ever resettled. The UK granted resettlement to less than 5000 people last year, but most were Afghan and that scheme is now closed. The numbers admitted under continuing schemes were about 500.

(These aren't the numbers for asylum seekers granted refugee status. They are for people accepted from abroad).

The UK is clearly not in any danger of being overwhelmed by the numbers it agrees to accept with external processing. I'm sure there will be a quota on this scheme.

Nobody is asking the UK to take on all the world's refugees. Other countries take far more. But the inefficiency and reduction in internationally agreed controls since Brexit have made it a more attractive target for asylum seekers, including those unlikely to be at risk in their home countries

You don't solve these problems by ignoring them or refusing to engage with them. The UK needs to develop a sensible policy in this area, and this project looks like a sensible strand.

But anyone we accept is on top of the usual 100,000 asylum seekers, which is already far too many.

Clavinova · 27/06/2026 19:41

Oftenaddled · 27/06/2026 14:37

I don't really understand your point about the proxy vetting system.

I haven't seen people claiming the current system is fine on this thread, but I haven't read every post. It's not fine. It needs to change. This would be part of that change.

How do you stop people from arriving in small boats and claiming asylum? By restoring the Dublin Agreement which we lost with Brexit. The Dublin Agreement meant people could be returned to the first safe country they entered. We didn't need to process their claims. That's why these numbers have soared since Brexit, and I agree with you it is a problem for everyone involved.

So how do we get back there, post Brexit? We need to put in place plans to take our quota of refugees whom we have screened abroad. It's a good idea to have schemes like this to help them integrate if possible. And taking in our share of refugees under systems we control is the route to agreeing a return to the safe country system. That's why I would support this scheme, not because I want to see more of the same

How do you stop people from arriving in small boats and claiming asylum? By restoring the Dublin Agreement which we lost with Brexit.

Why did 10,000 people arrive by small boat before we left the Dublin Agreement?

Ietthemeatcake · 27/06/2026 19:41

apeaceful2026 · 27/06/2026 11:17

I hosted a Ukrainian mum and children and it was hard because there was zero support for me as a sponsor. I was left to do all the admin, deal with her emotional breakdowns (understandable for what she was going through), find English lessons, translate for her in appointments despite not knowing more than a few words of her language. That was on top of the part where her culture took over the house and I was treated like the house guest rather than the host. Of course it's so hard to enforce boundaries when you can't have a verbal conversation and everything is through typing out translations on an app, that they don't really understand and you don't quite understand the response for either. It was harder than having a child to take care of. The council has set up a team but when I contacted them they weren't interested in offering her any support or signposting to any charities, or finding us a translator to create a plan. There was also no plan offered by the local homes for ukraine scheme for moving her into her own accommodation, helping her find work, integrating her with English lessons etc. it was all left in my shoulders and of course anything I suggested she didn't want to to. There should have been a case manager making sure there was progress.

We are still hosting - it's been over 3 years and I agree about the lack of support. You are just left to get on with it and there is no proper review, no check in, no long term plans to get your guest into sustainable long term accommodation. Even when they are working they aren't encouraged to get their own place, and it's all on the sponsor to try to sort out them moving on and it makes it hard to end the arrangement. We expected it to be a short term thing to help someone to safety and to get established. if I wanted a long term lodger, I'd have got one.

CloudyWithAChanceOfCustard · 27/06/2026 19:45

What in the hell’s arsehole scheme is this now??? Absolutely fuck all chance I’d be inviting a stranger to share my home!

Is she insane?? 🤯

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 19:46

LiveLuvLaugh · 27/06/2026 15:34

I would have an Afghan woman if I had a spare room.

If only hey.

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 19:52

Oftenaddled · 27/06/2026 15:54

If we can cap the number of refugees, that means the focus is on controlled admissions rather than whoever shows up in a small boat. This scheme seems to be about exactly that.

So I we can get the number of asylum seekers down from the current 100,000 per year to 10,000 we could then take another 10,000 under this scheme. I won't hold my breath.

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 19:53

Oftenaddled · 27/06/2026 16:03

There's been a surge in the numbers arriving by small boats in the last few years. Since reaching bilateral agreements with France in the last year, we are seeing a decline, but it's early days.

When you track the number of people reaching Europe by various smuggled routes like this, they don't all rise and fall in sync. Usage rises and falls depending how well they are policed.

So yes, the UK, with European cooperation, should certainly be capable of reversing this increase. Why wouldn't they? It's a recent surge with observable causes which can be tackled. There are early signs that that may be happening.

Even if you don't want to read much more, look at the graph here to see that this is a relatively recent surge. It's not a fact of nature. It can be tackled.

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/people-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats/

Have you any suggestions for stemming the flow yourself, with or without this scheme?

Rwanda.

suburburban · 27/06/2026 19:55

5MinuteArgument · 27/06/2026 18:06

Yes, we don't need to import people from very different cultures to do the work we need to be done here. We have over a million young people not in education, employment or training.

Exactly, there is another thread moaning about paying out pensions for the people who actually work and pay NI but let’s import even more people who need financial support and housing

the small boats won’t stop, enough is enough

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 19:58

HumberSquid · 27/06/2026 16:31

Levi Bellfield is a white British male and a lot of women marry and raise families with those.

Would you tell the family of Rhiannon Whyte that some women have also been murdered by British men? You probably would. Disgusting.

Fresdom · 27/06/2026 20:00

Clavinova · 27/06/2026 19:41

How do you stop people from arriving in small boats and claiming asylum? By restoring the Dublin Agreement which we lost with Brexit.

Why did 10,000 people arrive by small boat before we left the Dublin Agreement?

Or by leaving the refugee convention, making illegal entry a criminal offense (which it already is) , detaining and deporting.

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 20:01

Oftenaddled · 27/06/2026 16:35

I would also be glad to reduce the pull factors. Illegal working is a huge one. I know young men with intellectual disabilities who have been "employed" at five pounds a day, as asylum seekers. Our systems for checking employers and ID don't seem to work. I wonder what measures might be more effective there?

I suppose there are hotel and rent contracts etc that would represent people with an interest in keeping small boats flowing. But I'm not sure we're talking about a large number of people with a lobbying group there. I suspect it's more a matter of opportunism. Still, off-shore processing would counteract that group.

The appeals amount to thousands of years of lawyer hours.

SatsumaDog · 27/06/2026 20:01

Absolutely not. I have children and there’s. I way I would have a stranger moving into their home.

Islavadaukrani · 27/06/2026 20:07

@Lollygaggle I winced at your post because I get it. The intrusion is suffocating. Like you I opened my HOME, not a premises, not an empty house, my family HOME to this ukranian man and while i cannot discuss everything in case it did get picked up by papers as it is now a court matter but turns out this fucker that I gave my spare room to only came here on ONE of his two legal passports. He had one in his actual surname and one in his stepdads surname and nothing was cross checked when he came to this country. He was claiming 'asylum' or international protection in one name and working in the other but claiming housing in two names. I wouldnt mind but the bloke was an athlete, well able to have served his country just did not really fucking fancy it. It is a year since he has gone and only recently did I get notice that he cannot legally be anywhere near me or my home again but I am actually living in fear of him. He is a dangerous individual. Makes me sick when I think of all I did for him like make medical apps and stuff thinking he was totally helpless etc when he was a conniving delusional manipulator.

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 20:07

MrsPapillon · 27/06/2026 17:27

What does that have to do with my question? If Putin (male) sends his (male) army to invade the UK, would you want your children to leave and go somewhere safe? Would you hope that somebody somewhere would take care of them until they could come home? Do you think the evacuation programs of WW2 were wrong?

My kids will need to leave and go somewhere safe if we keep accepting more men from Syria, Afganistan, Sudan etc so I'll take my chances.

Hopefully if a country offered my children safe refuge they wouldn't rape anybody or stab them. If they did I could understand them being unwelcome - couldn't you?

MrsPapillon · 27/06/2026 20:10

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 20:07

My kids will need to leave and go somewhere safe if we keep accepting more men from Syria, Afganistan, Sudan etc so I'll take my chances.

Hopefully if a country offered my children safe refuge they wouldn't rape anybody or stab them. If they did I could understand them being unwelcome - couldn't you?

Every one of them is a rapist and a murderer?

cornflakecrunchie · 27/06/2026 20:18

My post got deleted so I won't go into detail again, I'll just say absobloodylutely NOT.

PashaMinaMio · 27/06/2026 20:20

Cockerpoomom · 27/06/2026 08:00

We can barely support ourselves never mind a stranger.

This country really is getting a joke now. I wish I could emigrate and get the hell out of here .

Agreed. The fkng UK is broken. I’d love to get out but is there anywhere better in the world?

DBSFstupid · 27/06/2026 20:22

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 18:55

I'd say anyone that will agree to take a man and has children in the house should have social services involvement for a severe lack of judgement and safeguarding.

😂

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 20:23

JazzyJelly · 27/06/2026 19:27

I might consider a woman and/or children. But I think we should as a country give priority to women and children. I think, for instance, any female person with a Afghan passport should be given asylum.

45 million people in Afganistan so if they can get passports you are happy for 22 million women and girls to come?
Perhaps they can reunite with their husbands and son's under this new scheme and the whole of bloody Afghanistan can live here.

What do you think uk life would be like then? Do you enjoy looking out of windows?
Being able to see a doctor?
Your daughter going to school?

God help us all.

dapsnotplimsolls · 27/06/2026 20:23

Winter2020 · 27/06/2026 20:07

My kids will need to leave and go somewhere safe if we keep accepting more men from Syria, Afganistan, Sudan etc so I'll take my chances.

Hopefully if a country offered my children safe refuge they wouldn't rape anybody or stab them. If they did I could understand them being unwelcome - couldn't you?

Russia has an asylum scheme. Off you pop.

JoyousOpalLemur · 27/06/2026 20:25

If you look at the news just from today, in Chertsey and Ealing Broadway, you'll find two of the most horrendous crimes that have been carried out in the history of this country.

Who in their right mind would want to risk living with men like that?

OP posts: