Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

When will people realise that pensioners have paid for their state pension.

782 replies

notsafeanymore · 19/06/2026 09:13

Every time there is a debate about the cost of living pensioners get a bashing.
And some have also paid for a private pension.
It's people who have never worked that should be targeted first.
I'm not on about the disabled. It's people who are benefit cheats and have never worked.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
ByQuaintAzureWasp · 19/06/2026 14:48

Exactly, my hubby abd I have just paid £3k each to top up our state pensions so how is it a "benefit"?

furimosa · 19/06/2026 14:48

@WhereverIlaymycatthatsmyhome not sure @20thCenturyFecks was referring to that generation 😉

furimosa · 19/06/2026 14:49

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 19/06/2026 14:48

Exactly, my hubby abd I have just paid £3k each to top up our state pensions so how is it a "benefit"?

Why would paying for something not make it a benefit? What do you get back for that 3k?

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 19/06/2026 14:49

BelieveInCher · 19/06/2026 14:47

Agree with all of this.

It was only pensioners who voted for brexit. Dont think so.

Crikeyalmighty · 19/06/2026 14:51

@Scotiasdarling when we lived in Copenhagen childcare wasa fixed fee ( very reasonable too at around £280 a month) regardless of income or whether your little one was 6 months or 4- - to be honest I think it’s fair because those on £100k income are also by far the largest tax and NI payers and getting not much for it - I don’t believe in free hours, it never works out that way and nurseries are getting round it by adding in excessive ‘costs’ to make the business work - I think very subsidised fixed fee regardless of income is far fairer all round- and even if I was on minimum wage I would think the same -

20thCenturyFecks · 19/06/2026 14:53

Fiftyandme · 19/06/2026 14:37

We are? Can you show me where you d got that information from?

Also if you’ve had the good fortune to be able to save money then frankly, one can hardly complain.

Edited

One can and is indeed complaining.

As for the lost generations (for want of a better word) employment has been an issue for a growing number of individuals who are perfectly capable of working for some time. If you want figures go and look at the Blue Book (UK NationaI Accounts) Im not here to educate you.

NorthXNorthWest · 19/06/2026 14:54

furimosa · 19/06/2026 14:22

Without the conditions for growth, you get exactly where we are now. The myth of "taxing for growth" and attempts to redistribute "wealth" that has not yet been created

Things aren’t going to change are they? How depressing.

I hope they will. I just don't think the "King of the North" is the answer, or that he has any of the answers.

If more spending, more borrowing and a bigger state were the solutions, Britain should be thriving or starting to thrive by now.

Crikeyalmighty · 19/06/2026 14:55

msmolli · 19/06/2026 14:45

Why then if you miss a few years, do you get the chance to "top up" so that you can get more pension?

Because you are under the number of qualifying years of NI contributions needed to receive full state pension - so your £3k , which is about 6 years voluntary contributions if I remember correctly will give you around £1500 a year extra pension ad infinitum - a great deal! You can only go back 6 years though maximum.

Maaate · 19/06/2026 14:55

Really 🫣

I'm glad I followed the advice given 30 years ago and started a private pension when I started working!

suburburban · 19/06/2026 14:56

Badbadbunny · 19/06/2026 14:17

We only need mass immigration if there are jobs for them all and they actually work in well paying jobs, paying taxes etc. that don't displace our existing working age population.

How do we achieve that?

We already have relatively high unemployment, especially young unemployment.

How do we "force" immigrants to actually work in decent jobs, paying decent amounts of tax, and not become a burden by being benefit claimants themselves?

We seemed to have had mass immigration anyway and it is not working, many of them need housing and benefits however much the government pretends they don’t

menopausequeen · 19/06/2026 14:56

notsafeanymore · 19/06/2026 09:13

Every time there is a debate about the cost of living pensioners get a bashing.
And some have also paid for a private pension.
It's people who have never worked that should be targeted first.
I'm not on about the disabled. It's people who are benefit cheats and have never worked.

absolutely agree.
Labour- don’t pick on the ones who worked enough to get a state pension. Think about all those who have never worked (not profoundly disabled) who lived life on welfare.
Labour can’t keep taking from the people who contribute

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 14:57

Scotiasdarling · 19/06/2026 14:11

Could you tell us which things please?

Well they certainly won’t include the things that the generations since continue to benefit from because boomers fought for them. Off the top of my head:

Age, sex, racial, religious and disability discrimination protections established by the passing of various legislation - latterly the Equality Act 2010.

Maternity. The legal right for women to take time off to have kids without losing their jobs, which laid the groundwork for statutory maternity protections and pay. Not to mention making it illegal to fire a woman for announcing she is pregnant.

The right for women not to be arbitrarily excluded from occupational pensions, or losing access to them on leaving work.

Not exactly what I would call pulling up the drawbridge behind you, but then only on MN are boomers so roundly hated for simply being in the right place at the right time.

ThreadGuardDog · 19/06/2026 14:58

Crikeyalmighty · 19/06/2026 14:55

Because you are under the number of qualifying years of NI contributions needed to receive full state pension - so your £3k , which is about 6 years voluntary contributions if I remember correctly will give you around £1500 a year extra pension ad infinitum - a great deal! You can only go back 6 years though maximum.

I think this is what many people fail to grasp - you can’t just make up the number of lost contributions you need. As you say the last six years is the maximum you can regain.

CopeNorth · 19/06/2026 14:59

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 19/06/2026 10:30

Not to derail, but I feel desperately sorry for the generations who will face decades of repaying tens of thousands for university, which those my age got completely free; then unachievably high housing costs with enormous mortgages for those who are able to get them; and then paying for the state pensions of my and older generations, whilst never receiving one themselves.

In the midst of all of that, they somehow have to find the means of paying for 100% of their own pensions.

Yes. Completely agree.

NorthXNorthWest · 19/06/2026 15:00

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 19/06/2026 14:48

Exactly, my hubby abd I have just paid £3k each to top up our state pensions so how is it a "benefit"?

Benefits work both ways.

Every person who can build some degree of financial self-reliance and minimise their dependence on the NHS and the state is a benefit not only to themselves, but also to taxpayers and those who genuinely need support.

Labour would have you believe that anyone who manages to build any degree of self-reliance has somehow gained an unfair advantage. That is how distorted the debate has become.

LlynTegid · 19/06/2026 15:02

Differentforgirls · 19/06/2026 13:54

You don't pay NI when you retire.

That is what I think should change. Say a reduced rate where income is twice the state pension amount.

NorthXNorthWest · 19/06/2026 15:02

Zigoo · 19/06/2026 13:15

This is true. It can’t be right.

It shouldn't be true, but it is possible for some.

BelieveInCher · 19/06/2026 15:02

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 19/06/2026 14:49

It was only pensioners who voted for brexit. Dont think so.

That’s not what the pp said, but I appreciate your need to utterly ignore nuance. In any case, here you go: EU referendum: The result in maps and charts https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36616028

When will people realise that pensioners have paid for their state pension.
Error404FucksNotFound · 19/06/2026 15:03

Anyone who thinks its not fair that they pay in if blah blah blah so they will stop, spend all their money now and rely on the state is a fool.

There will be nothing and if you haven't made your own provisions, you'll be fucked.

So yeah, spend all your money now so that you'll get the same as Joe blogs down the road who never did anything and enjoy it when that 'same' that you get is sweet fa, poverty, cold, and the shittest of all basic care homes.

Celebrate that you didn't have to pay for the fuck all you're getting and be pleased that you didn't save money you could have saved that would have seen you warmer, better fed and happier cos you really got to stick it to the government 👍

furimosa · 19/06/2026 15:07

Scotiasdarling · 19/06/2026 14:45

Not at all. But people used to earn and pay for childcare from their earnings.

@Scotiasdarling people still do that.

Yellowshirt · 19/06/2026 15:07

user1471538275 · 19/06/2026 09:23

You're wrong.

Some pensioners have paid something towards their pension, healthcare and social care needs as well as those free bus passes, free prescriptions, winter fuel payments and other perks.

Some have paid nothing at all.

Most have not paid anywhere near enough for what they are costing.

Most have sufficient assets and resources (usually housing) that they could afford to receive less and pay more in for the services they use.

As one of the wealthiest age groups in the country, who are the largest recipients of government money through different channels, the group needs to pay more.

The pensioners wouldn't except it and neither would the children as it's inheritance money they think they are entitled to. These same children would have also bought cheaper houses as prices only really shot up after 2010

Scotiasdarling · 19/06/2026 15:07

Swiss177 · 19/06/2026 10:45

That’s a very naive view.

The people you are talking about are the ones who pay huge sums of income tax and bankroll everyone else.

Someone on 125k pays 17x more income tax than someone earning 25k. On top of that their employer pays a further 18k employer NI.

The last thing you want to do is to encourage that cohort to lower their taxable income.

Woolly thinking. Someone on £125,000 doesn't get free childcare. They are however incentivised to reduce their income to below £100,000 to get that benefit. I am simply pointing out that they should pay their own childcare bills out of their own taxed income. The people drawing pensions now did exactly that.

BelieveInCher · 19/06/2026 15:08

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 19/06/2026 10:30

Not to derail, but I feel desperately sorry for the generations who will face decades of repaying tens of thousands for university, which those my age got completely free; then unachievably high housing costs with enormous mortgages for those who are able to get them; and then paying for the state pensions of my and older generations, whilst never receiving one themselves.

In the midst of all of that, they somehow have to find the means of paying for 100% of their own pensions.

It’s genuinely so refreshing to see this perspective rather than the usual screaming of “I’ve paid my dues!” As if the rest of us have been sitting around doing sod all. The fact of the matter is the younger generations are, and will continue to overpay their dues with absolutely nothing in return.

ThisHardyNavyZebra · 19/06/2026 15:09

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 19/06/2026 14:48

Exactly, my hubby abd I have just paid £3k each to top up our state pensions so how is it a "benefit"?

Because you expect to get back a lot more than you paid in?

furimosa · 19/06/2026 15:13

Yellowshirt · 19/06/2026 15:07

The pensioners wouldn't except it and neither would the children as it's inheritance money they think they are entitled to. These same children would have also bought cheaper houses as prices only really shot up after 2010

Edited

I would be fine losing out on potential inheritance. I’m not sure how you can be sure all of those dc are on the property ladder though.

Swipe left for the next trending thread