Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What could Andy Burnham do as PM to improve daily life?

213 replies

Seasidecatlady · 19/06/2026 08:05

There are some negative threads about Andy Burnham this morning so I wanted to have something a bit more positive and look at what he could do, if he becomes PM, to help improve our daily lives.

For me it would be:

  • re-nationalise water and utility companies and trains
  • reverse the national insurance hike for businesses so they can start hiring again and do more to support small businesses in general
  • a one off wealth tax to add funding to the defence budget
  • reform the student loans system, improve access to apprenticeship and also do more to help job seekers over 50.
OP posts:
Oncemorewithsome · 19/06/2026 08:24
  • add a bank holiday
  • give headteachers 10 days discretion on authorised holiday in term time (as it used to be)
Stella1366 · 19/06/2026 08:24

Duvetdayneeded · 19/06/2026 08:08

Sack miliband.
sack Sadiq Khan.
reduce welfare bill and stop lazy shits choosing not to work
stop England subsiding wales and Scotland and NI with free prescriptions, free adult care, free university

Edited

It's always someone else's fault and a race to the bottom isn't it 🙄

GCAcademic · 19/06/2026 08:24

Upstartled · 19/06/2026 08:18

Increase tax thresholds and allow people to lean into the kind of ambition and risk that can grow the economy instead of demoralising them into work-life balance apathy.

Axe stamp duty on primary residence so that we can get people into the most suitable housing stock and allow people to move to the jobs that fit their skill sets without a tax penalty.

Your going to be disappointed if you’re hoping any Labour government is going to do those things.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

MinnieCauldwell · 19/06/2026 08:26

Larrythecatforpm · 19/06/2026 08:16

Yes to the state pension being means tested, it takes up the largest percentage of the welfare bill and can’t be afforded anymore. Time to reform it completely.

I paid into the state pension and a private pension for 44 years, this will fund my care if needed or do you want to pay it? How about not giving state pensions and benefits to those who chose not to work. Bring back the child benefit cap at two kids.

Oncemorewithsome · 19/06/2026 08:26

Seasidecatlady · 19/06/2026 08:14

Yes I should have added pensions reform.

I would also like to see pensions means tested because I don't see why people with big private pension provisions should get a state pension.

I would also do the same for child benefit and the winter fuel allowance.

Basically there should always be a safety net but it should only apply to those who really need it.

I’d be very worried we would disincentive saving for a private pension or end up with people worse off, unless the thresholds are very high and ‘locked’ so they aren’t devalued by inflation over time.

LauraNorda · 19/06/2026 08:26

Seasidecatlady · 19/06/2026 08:05

There are some negative threads about Andy Burnham this morning so I wanted to have something a bit more positive and look at what he could do, if he becomes PM, to help improve our daily lives.

For me it would be:

  • re-nationalise water and utility companies and trains
  • reverse the national insurance hike for businesses so they can start hiring again and do more to support small businesses in general
  • a one off wealth tax to add funding to the defence budget
  • reform the student loans system, improve access to apprenticeship and also do more to help job seekers over 50.

On your first point, where is the money coming from to pay off shareholders in those companies? If your answer is along the lines of 'screw em', how would you feel if all houses were nationalised without any recompense?

Agree with your second point

Third point, no. Defence is an ongoing expense. Where will the money come from to maintain defence? Your way is similar to someone on the dole winning the Omaze house and then trying to maintain it whilst still on the dole.

Fourth point. OK but concentrate more on the younger people.

You touched on pensions later. Why should someone who has been prudent all their lives be penalised for building up a decent pension pot? Should such people have all their NI contributions refunded?

Upstartled · 19/06/2026 08:26

GCAcademic · 19/06/2026 08:24

Your going to be disappointed if you’re hoping any Labour government is going to do those things.

Hey, the thread title was what could he do... I'm well aware I'm shit out of luck.

Davros · 19/06/2026 08:27

Stop HS2
Stop right to buy
Grant oil exploration licences
renationalise water
Reform national insurance increase
Reform pensions
Drop winter fuel allowance for all
Drop free prescriptions for all over 60

OctaviaLemon · 19/06/2026 08:27

OP: None of those proposals were in the Labour Party Manifesto on which the party was elected by the people of the UK.

What right does Burnham - if he ever becomes leader of the party having already lost two leadership campaigns- have to introduce these policies?

Whether one likes it or not, Labour have a majority because the middle of the road voters backed Starmer who they saw as a middle of the road candidate.

So any new leader wanting to change the direction of travel would need to call a general election.

Bond yields already up so Burnhams victory is already costing ££££ that could have been spent on better things.

Thebigonesgetaway · 19/06/2026 08:28

Op do you not understand how goverment works? The prime minister isn’t a one man band, he’s just the figure head, leader, the party decides the politics and policies, not the prime minister, his or her powers are limited.

a change at the top is irrelevant, the party has to change its policies. And burnham is going to try to make it even more hard left than it is now, which is going to be utter fucking carnage, as this is not a hard left country and never will be, his own party will fight him and the voters will think Starmer was a saint in comparison,

NamelessNancy · 19/06/2026 08:32

OctaviaLemon · 19/06/2026 08:27

OP: None of those proposals were in the Labour Party Manifesto on which the party was elected by the people of the UK.

What right does Burnham - if he ever becomes leader of the party having already lost two leadership campaigns- have to introduce these policies?

Whether one likes it or not, Labour have a majority because the middle of the road voters backed Starmer who they saw as a middle of the road candidate.

So any new leader wanting to change the direction of travel would need to call a general election.

Bond yields already up so Burnhams victory is already costing ££££ that could have been spent on better things.

Remind me how many times the Tories changed leaders without going back to the electorate in recent years? Liz Truss had quite the mandate for the fiasco she caused didn't she?

Upstartled · 19/06/2026 08:33

Thebigonesgetaway · 19/06/2026 08:28

Op do you not understand how goverment works? The prime minister isn’t a one man band, he’s just the figure head, leader, the party decides the politics and policies, not the prime minister, his or her powers are limited.

a change at the top is irrelevant, the party has to change its policies. And burnham is going to try to make it even more hard left than it is now, which is going to be utter fucking carnage, as this is not a hard left country and never will be, his own party will fight him and the voters will think Starmer was a saint in comparison,

Oh, that's not fair. I'm on the other side to the political fence as the op, but it's clear this is a, 'if I were Queen', discussion, right? It is wishful thinking not a battle plan.

OctaviaLemon · 19/06/2026 08:34

NamelessNancy · 19/06/2026 08:32

Remind me how many times the Tories changed leaders without going back to the electorate in recent years? Liz Truss had quite the mandate for the fiasco she caused didn't she?

Are you saying that maakes it OK?

TallSturdyGirls · 19/06/2026 08:35

Duvetdayneeded · 19/06/2026 08:05

What on earth is positive about him… honestly… what were voters thinking!!

He's great. Sensible. Open minded. Backs community led regeneration. Wants to create reform of Public Services on a neighbourhood level. Giving money to well run community organisations rather than profit making DWP organisations.
I've been in meetings with him with very opposing views, and he manages to help people speak together in a more collaborative manner.
He's passionate, and isn't afraid to stand up for what he believes him even if it gets him in trouble.

Thebigonesgetaway · 19/06/2026 08:35

I find threads like this and the ops post so dismaying. How on earth do we get to a stage that adults in the uk have no grasp of how government works, no idea why there are whole parties of mps, or opposing parties and think it’s a dictatorship where someone becomes prime minister and just does things.

we need to better educate people.

GoodkneeBadKnee · 19/06/2026 08:37

Duvetdayneeded · 19/06/2026 08:08

Sack miliband.
sack Sadiq Khan.
reduce welfare bill and stop lazy shits choosing not to work
stop England subsiding wales and Scotland and NI with free prescriptions, free adult care, free university

Edited

Why would he sack Sadiq Khan? And how would doing so improve daily life? BTW, the PM can't sack an elected mayor

GeneralPeter · 19/06/2026 08:38

Legalise housebuilding.
Energy supply.
Reform social housing allocation.
Scrap SDLT. Tax simplification.
Scrap triple lock.

Dollymylove · 19/06/2026 08:38

Duvetdayneeded · 19/06/2026 08:08

Sack miliband.
sack Sadiq Khan.
reduce welfare bill and stop lazy shits choosing not to work
stop England subsiding wales and Scotland and NI with free prescriptions, free adult care, free university

Edited

Free university only for those with the top grades and bring back the student nursing bursary

BTsrule · 19/06/2026 08:38

Duvetdayneeded · 19/06/2026 08:08

Sack miliband.
sack Sadiq Khan.
reduce welfare bill and stop lazy shits choosing not to work
stop England subsiding wales and Scotland and NI with free prescriptions, free adult care, free university

Edited

Westminster doesn’t subsidise these things. Devolved nations get a budget. Up to them how they spend it.

GoodkneeBadKnee · 19/06/2026 08:39

Thebigonesgetaway · 19/06/2026 08:28

Op do you not understand how goverment works? The prime minister isn’t a one man band, he’s just the figure head, leader, the party decides the politics and policies, not the prime minister, his or her powers are limited.

a change at the top is irrelevant, the party has to change its policies. And burnham is going to try to make it even more hard left than it is now, which is going to be utter fucking carnage, as this is not a hard left country and never will be, his own party will fight him and the voters will think Starmer was a saint in comparison,

Obviously, the OP doesn't understand how politics work. Like a lot of posters on this thread...

Seasidecatlady · 19/06/2026 08:40

MinnieCauldwell · 19/06/2026 08:26

I paid into the state pension and a private pension for 44 years, this will fund my care if needed or do you want to pay it? How about not giving state pensions and benefits to those who chose not to work. Bring back the child benefit cap at two kids.

That is a common misunderstanding.

The fact is we are not paying into a state pension for ourselves.

We are just paying for current pensioners through taxes/national insurance.

You have not been building a state pension pot for yourself with your 44 year contributions unfortunately.

Reforming the system means making sure that the state pension system is still there for decades to come but only for those who need it.

OP posts:
Iocanepowder · 19/06/2026 08:41

Seasidecatlady · 19/06/2026 08:22

You can support both young people and older people when it comes to employment.

Ageism in the workplace is a major issue.

I don't see how worse the situation could be for water when we have poo in our rivers and seas, high bills and fat cat bosses...

If you nationalise water, the companies will have even less money than they do now for investment into infrastructure etc. It will only slow down improvements.

BTsrule · 19/06/2026 08:41

Thebigonesgetaway · 19/06/2026 08:35

I find threads like this and the ops post so dismaying. How on earth do we get to a stage that adults in the uk have no grasp of how government works, no idea why there are whole parties of mps, or opposing parties and think it’s a dictatorship where someone becomes prime minister and just does things.

we need to better educate people.

Yep. Maybe there should be a test to be allowed to vote. One of the questions could be ‘is there a magic money tree’?

Lifesd · 19/06/2026 08:41

Sack Ed milliband and reeves - divert money to defence and invest in something to sort out the dreadful situation with the NEETs. Oh and re privatise water and reform planning so some shit can actually get done. Also - sort out rail links in the north!

GoneWithTHeWindJammers · 19/06/2026 08:41

Call a General Election and give the electorate a chance to have their say. O voted for Starmer in 2024, not a cartoon character.

Swipe left for the next trending thread