Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Wealthy banker wis arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Bridge Pusher'

696 replies

roses2 · 15/06/2026 11:15

Wealthy banker with connections to royalty is arrested in hunt for notorious 'Putney Pusher' | Daily Mail Online

I vividly remember this case which still haunts me and cannot believe it was ten years ago. Finally someone has been arrested who appears to be an ex army wealthy man.

I hope he is charged - so arrogant.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
justasking111 · 15/06/2026 23:32

OH I've found him.

SomeGarlic · 15/06/2026 23:34

justasking111 · 15/06/2026 23:32

OH I've found him.

Me too. Google carefully explained what it can tell me and that it can't give me his name, then helpfully provided links to the TwitX threads with the deets 😂

CaesarAugusta · 15/06/2026 23:55

AnonyMumAuDHD · 15/06/2026 20:56

Am just annoyed that they know who he is but his name hasn’t been released…

There is good reason not to release names, as illustrated by the case of Christopher Jefferies. He was wrongly arrested for the murder of Joanna Yeates, and was subsequently released on bail. His name was released and he became the target of a media frenzy when all sorts of horrible and untrue allegations about him were published. Ultimately another man was charged and convicted, and Jefferies brought a number of successful libel claims against the newspapers involved. But none of that could undo the damage those newspapers did.

If this person is charged, we will know the name in due course. If he isn't, then we don't need to know the name.

Aluna · 16/06/2026 00:05

leshirondelles · 15/06/2026 21:54

@blueshoes Convicted of driving without due care and attention and failing to stop after hitting a woman cyclist with his Harley Davidson.

He’s basically done the same thing twice hasn’t he. Once could be considered misfortune etc…

blueminimoon · 16/06/2026 00:20

Jamesblonde2 · 15/06/2026 21:41

I don’t think his profession has anything to do with it. Nor how much money he has. There are arseholes/weirdos/violent people in many professions from different financial backgrounds.

We wouldn’t say skint care worker arrested…..would we?

it has a lot to do with it. A smaller circle, in the know, located in a particular part of the city, mostly all well aware of one another and their standing, and an obvious, therefore, coverup of this man's identity.

It's also quite well-known that certain professions have higher rates of corporate psychopaths in them.

GrumpyButOk · 16/06/2026 00:28

Web pages can be taken down, but the internet archive WaybackMachine may well still have them...

Wreckinball · 16/06/2026 00:28

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 15/06/2026 11:42

Why didn't the people who knew go to the police?

If he’s like that with strangers, imagine what he may be like with those close to him? They could have been terrified and waited until they’ve safely distanced themselves from him before speaking out

GrumpyButOk · 16/06/2026 00:30

Also, on an entirely unrelated subject (obviously) don't some trousers just scream "TWAT"?

NedsAtomicWheelieBin · 16/06/2026 01:12

Bawbagg · 15/06/2026 21:49

His wedding photos have been removed from the royalmusings website. Canny. Wouldn't be good for anyone in them if the papers got a hold of them now.

And the post on Reddit linking to the Telegraph post about the conviction has been removed. I wonder why 🤔

MsDitsy · 16/06/2026 01:17

CurdinHenry · 15/06/2026 11:43

While I'm glad his crime beard finally came clean kind of fuck her for covering up for this long

Considering what he did to this poor woman, she may have been too terrified.

StrawberrySundaes · 16/06/2026 01:56

BettyyB00 · 15/06/2026 12:41

His house is 'only' worth 1.4 mill according to the DM article here - so he's not that wealthy, in London banking terms..

He appears to have had a second divorce (or the second one is coming soon) and is co-parenting. That’s his divorce pad.

GwendolineFairfax8 · 16/06/2026 01:56

PerkingFaintly · 15/06/2026 14:19

Jeremy Freethy comes up as a fisherman from Truro jailed 2011, so I think @GwendolineFairfax8 is making a general point, not referring to anyone connected to this specific case?

Just to be clear that it won't cause problems for this case.

I'm sorry you've had to deal with that in your life.Flowers

Not connected - making the point that crimes can be covered up by people connected to them for years and not necessarily out of fear - until one day someone comes forward (in the Freethy case 45 years on).

I hope the victim of the (awful) Putney Pusher gets justice.

AlgaeDreams · 16/06/2026 02:40

It must be him, the police must be confident in their arrest otherwise it wouldn't be headline news with details of the suspect released.

It's one thing that's always properly shocked. He purposely went for her and pushed her. She wasn't in his way, she shouldn't have even been on his radar if he was just out for a run.
It happened though and something in his mind made him do it, it was hardly involuntary.

I don't understand the talk about attempted GBH. He, the pusher caused grievous bodily harm by that one action.
It's either GBH or it isn't. GBH also covers causing severe trauma or psychological injury.

If you attempt to cause GBH but fail then surely ABH has to be the charge. But I think psychological trauma must tip this one over that threshold.

But yes, it's been a long time mystery and I think anybody protecting him should also be named and charged.

MurunBuchstansangursCousinRossiter · 16/06/2026 03:04

AlgaeDreams · 16/06/2026 02:40

It must be him, the police must be confident in their arrest otherwise it wouldn't be headline news with details of the suspect released.

It's one thing that's always properly shocked. He purposely went for her and pushed her. She wasn't in his way, she shouldn't have even been on his radar if he was just out for a run.
It happened though and something in his mind made him do it, it was hardly involuntary.

I don't understand the talk about attempted GBH. He, the pusher caused grievous bodily harm by that one action.
It's either GBH or it isn't. GBH also covers causing severe trauma or psychological injury.

If you attempt to cause GBH but fail then surely ABH has to be the charge. But I think psychological trauma must tip this one over that threshold.

But yes, it's been a long time mystery and I think anybody protecting him should also be named and charged.

Edited

I agree. How the hell could anyone know it was him and not report it?

Saturnalio · 16/06/2026 03:54

justasking111 · 15/06/2026 23:25

The mail ran this story quite recently. Perhaps that nudged someone into coming forward.

Yes and lots of YouTubers have covered it recently again. It's definitely had some light again of late .. also children have grown in that time too so maybe he was recognised

Crushed23 · 16/06/2026 04:08

Not sure why the media is running with “wealthy banker” when we’re talking about the great-great-great-grandson of Queen Victoria (or whatever). Surely his links to royalty are more shocking than his profession. 🤷‍♀️

DumpyVictoria · 16/06/2026 04:32

Backedoffhackedoff · 15/06/2026 17:53

It’s not odd at all, there are a number of unsolved crimes where names have been reported but the police can’t get the evidence to arrest or charge. Claudia Lawrence being one of the most well known.

the first thing I thought is I bet the police have known who he is for ages but haven’t had sufficient evidence.

With Claudia Lawrence, it's thought that it was someone at the university where she worked, I think? But not someone in the kitchens.

Glitterella · 16/06/2026 05:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

DumpyVictoria · 16/06/2026 05:21

Bawbagg · 15/06/2026 21:49

His wedding photos have been removed from the royalmusings website. Canny. Wouldn't be good for anyone in them if the papers got a hold of them now.

If you just Google him and his wife's wedding, they come up.

Wonderlandpeony · 16/06/2026 05:25

Found him now through reddit, something a bit off with the way he looks in photos.

DumpyVictoria · 16/06/2026 05:30

Regardless of who the arrestee is, I cannot believe he's being charged with GBH or whatever it is, and not attempted murder. I know some say it's because it's easier to get a conviction with a lesser charge, but surely we can't go around charging people with lesser crimes than they actually committed unless there's not much evidence? In this case, the attempted murder is literally on camera.

What on earth possessed him? Why would anybody do that to someone? Just why? She could have been early-carrying twins, for all he knew, and potentially killed them too.

The fact that the perpetrator came back 15 mins later to inspect his "handiwork" is seriously chilling.

Wonderlandpeony · 16/06/2026 05:35

@DumpyVictoria He looks like he might have an alcohol problem, face quite puffy. Definite anger issues I'd say, and yes definitely agree it was attempted murder. Let's hope he doesn't get off with a light sentence

AlgaeDreams · 16/06/2026 05:42

Looks like a smug wanker.

JulietteHasAGun · 16/06/2026 05:47

It has to tick various boxes/meet a threshold. Murder (or attempted murder )is all to do with intent which is very hard to prove from a pushing situation. Did he intend to kill her. Because he had his back to the bus it would be very easy for him to argue he was unaware it was coming. He could even argue he didn’t intend for her to fall into the road.

I actually know someone who killed another person during a brief argument where the victim was pushed over. He was charged with both murder and manslaughter which I believe is unusual and went to crown court on both charges. The judge quite early on said the murder charges were not to be considered as it didn’t meet the threshold for murder. And this was a case where because the victim knew the perpetrator it could have been argued that there was possibly more chance for premeditation.

it is tricky because premeditation doesn’t have to be lengthy. But you do also need intent to kill and that’s very hard to prove. More so when the victim didn’t die.

Wonderlandpeony · 16/06/2026 05:51

He has previous and was incredibly smug and arrogant when he went to court for it, definitely a dangerous man. Hope he gets an appropriate sentence this time!