Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Is bankruptcy inevitable now for the UK

352 replies

BringOnTheHandyMan · 16/05/2026 20:05

In the most layman of terms the UK is actually broke.

Every month we cannot pay the interest on our outstanding debt and thus have to borrow more. (Note this is not repaying the capital, just the interest)

The rate we pay to borrow used to be quite low and that is not the case anymore.
The bond markets have lost faith in the UK and charge us a rate that reflects it.

We have systems we can no longer afford (welfare, NHS etc)
We have little to no growth
We have inflation issues (so printing money is out)
Raising or cutting interest rates is problematic due to having both growth and inflation issues together
Our politicians are scrapping like rats in a barrel and even prior to that they seem incapable of making hard decisions or even facing up to the mess we are in.

We do actually need a PM that stands up and says okay folks we are in deep shit. We are broke. Actually worse than that. In debt and unable to pay even the interest.
So any borrowing we do must be for investing/growing the economy only. All spare money must be used for paying down debt or investing/growing the economy. That means for the foreseeable future all state funding is scrapped. We would enter a period of being very much a 'poor country' and acting like it. If we worked really hard we might be able to turn it around but it would take years, hard decisions and many, many sacrifices.

Since I can't see any party being able to actually do that. Then I honestly don't see how we can go anywhere except an IMF bailout. Then they will play the tough guys and cut the lot anyway.

I try to plan for my retirement but honestly it's sort of impossible.

For those with public sector pensions I wouldn't be sure you will get it paid
For those with private defined contribution pensions, the stock market is vastly overpriced just now and your pension is likely to fall once the AI bubble bursts.
State pension - yip not convinced we'll be getting that
Costs to be budgeted for - healthcare but how much?
Downsize my house - perhaps but will house prices tumble making this impossible.

Does anyone think that any government (regardless of party) can fix the country. If not what happens. The UK used to have no NHS or welfare so do we just go back to that. How long will it be until the wheels come off?

Lots of threads about which benefits should be cut etc but nobody seems to be shouting that actually it ALL needs to be cut regardless of what hardship it causes.

OP posts:
CoffeeNDogs · 17/05/2026 20:19

One of the biggest issues is having an aging population. Because this increases public spending on pensions, benefits (as some people 50+ are genuinely to ill to work) and of course health care.

At the same time we are not supporting our young people enough to enter the workplace. Schools always pushing for 6 form and university, employers wanting 5 years experience and the ability to speak 10 languages while doing summersaults for entry level jobs. That's just so disheartening. No wonder they are looking at benefits alternatives for getting money to survive.

I do think something has to change, but it's not just on an political or economic level its also on an societal level. The current mindset THEM versus US is creating friction that allows politicians to ignore the real issues and carry on lining their own pockets.

Aspirex · 17/05/2026 20:19

The Uk as gone down hill so much our NHS is falling to bits.
Im having all my teeth sorted before they close my dentist or change it to privet.

MissConductUS · 17/05/2026 20:20

We have a TV news program in the US called 60 Minutes. Ages ago, they did a story about the disability welfare system in Italy. At that time, something like 30% of the adult population had somehow gotten on disability benefits. They went to a village to interview people about it and found that the village bus driver was collecting benefits for being blind.

Some of the news makes it sound like that's where the UK is headed.

MsGreying · 17/05/2026 20:20

Unless we grow the economy were doomed

Reduce the cost of employing someone.

Make it easier for employers to take people on. Make it easier to get onto benefits if you lose your job. But make it so you get less money if you don't work. There has to be a really good reason to work. It has to pay.

Offer incentives for companies to be successful.

Make energy cheaper.

Within half a mile of my house a private company is making tonnes of money from turning gas into electricity. It only does this because they can make shit loads of money.

BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 20:21

MissConductUS · 17/05/2026 19:55

I’m an American who had been on MN for about eight years. While we have our own economic challenges, I’ve been continually surprised by how many Brits here are completely oblivious to the UK’s much more dire situation. The common sentiment seems to be that welfare spending in the UK is just barely sufficient and that the answer is higher taxes.

It’s good to see that some people here appreciate that the low growth, low productivity economic environment is what’s put the UK into this position in the first place.

Someone upthread said that non-welfare spending, including on defense, has been steady. I don’t know about the other categories, but your defense spending in real terms has declined dramatically since the end of the cold war and left your military hanging on by its fingernails. I’m ex-military and regularly see people here assuming that you have defense capabilities that were cut decades ago or never existed.

I don’t see any easy way out of this, but am greatly heartened that you are having an honest discussion about it.

Yes I saw that comment about defence and thought bollocks. Europe has been relying to the USA to defend it for years and has cut its defences to the bone.
The UK is a sitting duck if anyone attacks us and Trump decides not to honour the NATO contract.
Plus investing in defence would create jobs for our young.
The UK has been resting on it's laurels for quite some time.

OP posts:
MidnightMeltdown · 17/05/2026 20:21

The other problem in the UK is that we have far too many piss takers. We need to get a lot tougher on things like disability benefits. Even compared to countries like the US (where the population is fatter and unhealthier), the number of people on disability benefits in the UK is through the roof

Is bankruptcy inevitable now for the UK
Sassoon · 17/05/2026 20:22

VoiceFromThePit · 16/05/2026 22:41

It’s impossible for the UK to go bankrupt as we have our own currency and can create/print/devalue as much of it as we want.

Things will just continue to get worse but no bankruptcy is not on the cards.

The UK has not had a government that cared about anything other than lining their own pockets for many years. We need someone fiscally responsible like John Major, not someone who simply wants to steal money from the middle earners and give it to the low-earners while ignoring the top earners.

What the UK neeeds is an end to unauthorised immigration (all boats immediately taken back to France by the Navy by force) and we need a large amount of authorised productive immigration (skilled people to do the jobs that the brits refuse to do). We need more but the correct type of immigration.

We need a move away from seeing house prices as the way to riches - so we need much higher property taxes at the top, and not the situation where people in mansions pay the same as those in semi-detached houses.

On top of that we need a much faster move to private pensions to reduce the state pension cost, we need long term vision not the usual short-term short sightedness. If the government gave every new born £10k in a pension globally diversified when they are born then it would in time eradicate the state pension requirement entirely. That £10k is a lot less than the government blew during covid, so it is realistically doable.

The biggest cost to the UK is the NHS due to ageing population, that should in-part be funded by wealth taxes for those with over £10million of assets.

Another major problem is that we continue to allow those at the top to avoid taxation by using trusts and this needs to be changed by new laws including allowing the UK to repatriate assets held overseas.

On a more local level, care costs account for around 60% of all council tax spending, this needs to be funded from central government not council tax, and then business rates could be removed entirely to help our high streets and small businesses.

This. Amazed at the people wanting to up everyone’s tax but not touch a wealth tax.

BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 20:28

Pastlast · 17/05/2026 20:02

We won’t be going to the IMF like we did in the 70s. Our hand was forced then because of our foreign currency liabilities. U.K. govt gilts are in sterling now so there won’t be that hard stop. That’s not a good thing in my opinion it could lead to even more crazy decisions.

Edited

Your right. We can keep going in a downward spiral for longer. Inflation will keep going up especially with food and fuel. Growth will keep stalling and we will keep borrowing. The rates to borrow will keep increasing. As everything gets more expensive the government will try and pacify everyone with cost of living help which will increase govt spending. Thus borrowing goes up more and the rate to borrow goes up again.

Anyone who has ever taken out a payday loan should have a cold shiver going down them right now.

Also if we try printing money and devalue our currency all our imports will get more expensive. Given we import so much of our food and energy that would be a disaster.

OP posts:
justinhawkinsnavalfluff · 17/05/2026 20:30

If Reform get in it will be a knock on cert we will go bankrupt.

MissConductUS · 17/05/2026 20:33

Sassoon · 17/05/2026 20:22

This. Amazed at the people wanting to up everyone’s tax but not touch a wealth tax.

Wealth taxes don't work very well and are difficult to administer. They also don't raise much money, compared to the budget gaps people want to fill. Most countries that have tried them have abandoned them. From The Economist:

Don’t tax wealth - Even the most sophisticated arguments in favour of doing so make no sense

LemonTT · 17/05/2026 20:35

MrThorpeHazell · 17/05/2026 14:27

Yep, some of us have been here before!

Our current economy is nothing like that of 1976. Nor are our politics, taxation or industrial relations.

BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 20:43

Bringemout · 17/05/2026 20:10

I’ve been moaning about this on here, anyone who mentions bond markets is accused of being an evil blood sucking servant of capitalism.

Theres an unwillingness to believe that you can’t just borrow willy nilly with no consequences. I think it’s the electorate just do not understand how we fund everything and how it can come crashing down and it won’t be little cuts, it would be drastic, genuinely painful cuts, some of our own MP’s thought that we could just ignore the bond markets.

I think alot of the general public don't understand what the bond markets are or how they work. Also lots of politicians don't seem to understand either.
Andy B said the bond markets will just have to get in line. Aye will they Andy. Well this weekend traders have started selling them off on the news that you might be PM.

He's a good looking man but sounds worse than Keir for the economy.

My understanding is that when our bonds fall due for repayment we just reborrow the same amount to roll them over. However presumably we will now be rolling them over at much increased interest rates to when they got taken out originally.

We can only ignore the bond markets if we don't need to borrow from them or have any debt with them. Otherwise ignore them at your peril.

OP posts:
BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 20:49

cushioncoversarerubbish · 17/05/2026 20:13

Quite. I’m not 50 yet but I’ve paid in for decades. I have zero expectation of ever receiving a state pension. Today, almost 1 million 16-24 yr olds are NEET. There are literally not enough people working left to pay my pension. The money I have paid in is gone and no one is coming up behind me to keep paying. Those are the unpalatable facts.

I don't think they will get rid of the state pension but I think they will phase it out through erosion. For example tax allowances are frozen and as pensions go up each year pensioners will soon be paying tax on them even if that is all they have.

The frozen tax allowances are a stealth tax which will erode the state pension with no one noticing.

I think they will keep putting the retirement age up every 5 years or so until people don't get till 75 or something.

OP posts:
BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 20:55

CoffeeNDogs · 17/05/2026 20:19

One of the biggest issues is having an aging population. Because this increases public spending on pensions, benefits (as some people 50+ are genuinely to ill to work) and of course health care.

At the same time we are not supporting our young people enough to enter the workplace. Schools always pushing for 6 form and university, employers wanting 5 years experience and the ability to speak 10 languages while doing summersaults for entry level jobs. That's just so disheartening. No wonder they are looking at benefits alternatives for getting money to survive.

I do think something has to change, but it's not just on an political or economic level its also on an societal level. The current mindset THEM versus US is creating friction that allows politicians to ignore the real issues and carry on lining their own pockets.

I suppose if they leave the NHS as it is more and more people will die younger as they don't get operations they need etc.

Alternatively if they make it private then people will die when they can't afford the bills.

Earlier deaths means less state pensions.

Only those with enough money to pay for their own healthcare will live longer.

I suppose that's a 'strategy' of sorts. Stealth deaths by lack of healthcare.

OP posts:
Myskyscolour · 17/05/2026 20:56

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 17/05/2026 19:52

@Myskyscolour There is no incentive to work more hours when you lose benefits. Eg a single mum on benefits will have had free school meals and pupil premium for dc at school and brighter dc going to university are possibly going to get a bursary too. That’s often £2-3,000. Then there’s concessionary prices and you are better off by not working. This has to stop but Labour backbenchers won’t have it.

The Times has a brilliant article today in the Sunday Times about why we cannot resolve our fiscal or governance issues. I agree with every word. We are currently ungovernable and no one can solve it.

Exactly, I fully agree. We need to stop linking all sorts of advantages to benefits. Bottom line is that nobody should be better off on benefits than in work, and yes that included the aforementioned advantages.

HaveYouFedTheFish · 17/05/2026 20:56

CoffeeNDogs · 17/05/2026 20:19

One of the biggest issues is having an aging population. Because this increases public spending on pensions, benefits (as some people 50+ are genuinely to ill to work) and of course health care.

At the same time we are not supporting our young people enough to enter the workplace. Schools always pushing for 6 form and university, employers wanting 5 years experience and the ability to speak 10 languages while doing summersaults for entry level jobs. That's just so disheartening. No wonder they are looking at benefits alternatives for getting money to survive.

I do think something has to change, but it's not just on an political or economic level its also on an societal level. The current mindset THEM versus US is creating friction that allows politicians to ignore the real issues and carry on lining their own pockets.

This.

It's demographics not benefits as such.

The ageing population is not compatible with the Blairite movement to send all 18-21 year olds to university so that 90% of them can be in debt for a degree they never actually use, and clerical office jobs which used to require O level English and maths now "require" a bachelor's degree (even though obviously they don't really).

Blair only pushed for all the young adults to go to university to reduce unemployment figures ironically - now it means there's nobody qualified for skilled trades and surplus unemployable graduates who expect to be earning above average and have better conditions in the form of WFH etc. because they (like everyone else) have a degree...

cushioncoversarerubbish · 17/05/2026 20:57

MissConductUS · 17/05/2026 19:55

I’m an American who had been on MN for about eight years. While we have our own economic challenges, I’ve been continually surprised by how many Brits here are completely oblivious to the UK’s much more dire situation. The common sentiment seems to be that welfare spending in the UK is just barely sufficient and that the answer is higher taxes.

It’s good to see that some people here appreciate that the low growth, low productivity economic environment is what’s put the UK into this position in the first place.

Someone upthread said that non-welfare spending, including on defense, has been steady. I don’t know about the other categories, but your defense spending in real terms has declined dramatically since the end of the cold war and left your military hanging on by its fingernails. I’m ex-military and regularly see people here assuming that you have defense capabilities that were cut decades ago or never existed.

I don’t see any easy way out of this, but am greatly heartened that you are having an honest discussion about it.

Agree with this. In real terms, our defence spending is the equivalent of about 14 willing chaps. Armed with catapults. Practically, we are absolutely open to invasion or intrusion by a foreign power.
Our military has lots of fantastic people but they are trying to fight off a tsunami with a hand whisk. It’s a disgrace.

FernFaery · 17/05/2026 20:58

Dbank · 16/05/2026 20:16

The electorate don't realise, and certainly won't vote to do anything about it, and certainly not the current government.

Any attempt to reduce spending is smeared as "austerity", and spending more on benefits is "the right thing to do".

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 20:58

MsGreying · 17/05/2026 20:20

Unless we grow the economy were doomed

Reduce the cost of employing someone.

Make it easier for employers to take people on. Make it easier to get onto benefits if you lose your job. But make it so you get less money if you don't work. There has to be a really good reason to work. It has to pay.

Offer incentives for companies to be successful.

Make energy cheaper.

Within half a mile of my house a private company is making tonnes of money from turning gas into electricity. It only does this because they can make shit loads of money.

How do we make energy cheaper. We import most of it don't we? I mean the government can give us cost of living allowances against it but that does not make it cheaper for the country. The cost is just passed to the government who will pass it back to the taxpayer (or borrow more)

OP posts:
Myskyscolour · 17/05/2026 20:59

Kpo58 · 17/05/2026 19:51

There will never be an incentive to work, unless you make childcare affordable and accessible. You can't work if nearly all your salary goes on childcare or you can only do shift work (due to the lack of jobs near you), but there is no childcare available between 5:30am and 10:30pm on a ad-hoc basis as you only get your shift schedule the week before.

Childcare is only for a few years though, especially now with the funded hours. I do agree that state childcare like in France would help.

BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 21:01

justinhawkinsnavalfluff · 17/05/2026 20:30

If Reform get in it will be a knock on cert we will go bankrupt.

actually a move to the right would be seen as favourable by the bond markets who would anticipate reduced spending (resulting in cheaper costs to borrow hopefully)

Then if they do what they say and cut welfare etc then that would be a start.

So no reform getting in is not the worst thing that could happen. A move to the left politically will kill the country.

OP posts:
HaveYouFedTheFish · 17/05/2026 21:02

BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 21:01

actually a move to the right would be seen as favourable by the bond markets who would anticipate reduced spending (resulting in cheaper costs to borrow hopefully)

Then if they do what they say and cut welfare etc then that would be a start.

So no reform getting in is not the worst thing that could happen. A move to the left politically will kill the country.

You just made that up.

Pontificating confidently, anonymously and without evidence, doesn't make what you say true.

BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 21:03

MissConductUS · 17/05/2026 20:33

Wealth taxes don't work very well and are difficult to administer. They also don't raise much money, compared to the budget gaps people want to fill. Most countries that have tried them have abandoned them. From The Economist:

Don’t tax wealth - Even the most sophisticated arguments in favour of doing so make no sense

Agree they are a short term solution at best and drive our high net worth individuals out of the country. The individuals are probably paying huge amounts of income tax etc

OP posts:
BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 21:12

HaveYouFedTheFish · 17/05/2026 21:02

You just made that up.

Pontificating confidently, anonymously and without evidence, doesn't make what you say true.

what? Of course I didn't make that up. It's basic economics.

Left leaning governments spend more which we can't afford. With the latest political chaos the markets have already increased our rates to borrow as they are anticipating someone more left leaning than Keir getting in next.

Right leaning governments like reform are promising to slash welfare etc. The markets will look favourably on a government making sensible financial decisions to return us to financial viability.

Bond markets care about whether the UK is safe to invest in ie do we have a government who can return us to financial stability/growth. They don't give two hoots if people are dying in the street because their welfare has been cut.

Please google this if you don't believe me.

OP posts:
CoffeeNDogs · 17/05/2026 21:13

BringOnTheHandyMan · 17/05/2026 20:58

How do we make energy cheaper. We import most of it don't we? I mean the government can give us cost of living allowances against it but that does not make it cheaper for the country. The cost is just passed to the government who will pass it back to the taxpayer (or borrow more)

Stop liking electricity prices to wholesale gas prices for starters.

We need more incentives for households and industries to produce some of their own electricity by having solar panels and wind turbines to charge their own batteries.

And reduce the ridiculously high standing charges which were introduced in order to offset the increase in solar panels (= reduction in income for electricity companies.)